On 10/27/2011 7:51 AM, Bernd Petrovitsch wrote:
> Debian/stable is (or at least was) usually similar old as
> SuSE-enterprise and RHEL/CentOS.
This is simply not true. Debian stable has consistently newer packages
across the board compared to RHEL or CentOS. Debian Backports offers
even newer
On Mit, 2011-10-26 at 21:51 -0500, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
> On 10/26/2011 8:48 AM, Bernd Petrovitsch wrote:
> > On Mit, 2011-10-26 at 02:33 -0500, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
> >> On 10/25/2011 2:34 PM, Charles Marcus wrote:
> > []
> >>> A word of advice... you need to take a breath, and START OVER.
[..
please do not feed the troll
On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 12:54 PM, Dan Swartzendruber wrote:
>
> Ubuntu has a nice dovecot-postfix combo package.
>
>
Why do you troll
You do not help OP in any way saying, use another distribution, this is a
clear sign of TROLL
Too many on this list, if you not going to help OP piss off and dont click
that reply button and ignore tham, how about we tell you to use another
distribution that is current like gentoo,
Ubuntu has a nice dovecot-postfix combo package.
On 10/26/2011 8:48 AM, Bernd Petrovitsch wrote:
> On Mit, 2011-10-26 at 02:33 -0500, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
>> On 10/25/2011 2:34 PM, Charles Marcus wrote:
> []
>>> A word of advice... you need to take a breath, and START OVER.
>>
>> Yep. Start by ditching that old as dirt POS distro known as Ce
On Mit, 2011-10-26 at 02:33 -0500, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
> On 10/25/2011 2:34 PM, Charles Marcus wrote:
[]
> > A word of advice... you need to take a breath, and START OVER.
>
> Yep. Start by ditching that old as dirt POS distro known as CentOS.
Dovecot works fine on my CentOS-5.* and -6.
>
On 10/26/2011 3:36 AM, Maarten Bezemer wrote:
> and find out what it is that makes a mockery of any discussion between
> the two of you?
Discussion??
I *thoroughly* blocked Noel Butler about a year ago. Should I define
*thoroughly*? That means direct to MX, list mail, smoke signals, and
yodels
On Wed, 26 Oct 2011, Noel Butler wrote:
*sigh*
As usual Stanley, you do not contribute anything constructive, only
trollish jibberish
I don't know where both of you live, but can't you just grab a coffee and
find out what it is that makes a mockery of any discussion between the two
of you?
On Tue, 2011-10-25 at 11:33 -0700, Jack Fredrikson wrote:
> mailbox_command = /usr/local/libexec/dovecot/deliver -f "$SENDER" -a
> "$RECIPIENT"
>
get rid of this ^ in postifx main.cf
> dovecot unix - n n - - pipe
> flags=DRhu user=dovecot ar
*sigh*
As usual Stanley, you do not contribute anything constructive, only
trollish jibberish
Charles' advice however would be my next step, but at this point I think
it's a bit drastic.
On Wed, 2011-10-26 at 02:33 -0500, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
> On 10/25/2011 2:34 PM, Charles Marcus wrote:
> > J
On 10/25/2011 2:34 PM, Charles Marcus wrote:
> Jack,
>
> A word of advice... you need to take a breath, and START OVER.
Yep. Start by ditching that old as dirt POS distro known as CentOS.
And don't roll-your-own-Dovecot from source. Simply install Debian 6,
or get your VPS provider to swap your
Hi,
I've been away for a while, and the previous threads I stopped reading
because it makes reading War and Peace look more enticing.
Have you run in debug mode?
On Tue, 2011-10-25 at 11:33 -0700, Jack Fredrikson wrote:
> Hi;
>
> I continue to be plagued with this error:
>
> Oct 25 10:49:18
Jack,
A word of advice... you need to take a breath, and START OVER.
Postfix+Dovecot works very well together... you are doing something
wrong, and need to figure out what it is.
You are chasing your tail, and will never figure out what you are doing
wrong the way you are trying to troublesh
Hi;
I continue to be plagued with this error:
Oct 25 10:49:18 myserver postfix/pipe[3712]: 0423257901AB: to=,
relay=dovecot, delay=109318, delays=109318/0.14/0/0.1, dsn=4.3.0,
status=deferred (temporary failure
It's been a week that I've been working day and night to get this fixed.
I forgot
15 matches
Mail list logo
