On 06/26/2012 07:11 AM, Wojciech Puchar wrote:
>> The only draw back I see with maildir is one file per message. This
>
> it is mostly adventage.
Agreed.
>
>> makes it resilient to corruption that mbox sees (if a message gets
>> corrupted, you erase one message and that corruption won't propagate
>
> b) Make sure your local samba setup is joined to the domain. Make sure
> it writes an appropriate krb5.keytab (/etc/krb5.keytab in my setup) as
> part of its password management, etc.
>
> net ads keytab add smtp/mail_server_fqdn
> net ads keytab add imap/mail_server_fqdn
>
>
> You may have
On 06/25/2012 08:37 AM, Trever L. Adams wrote:
On 06/25/2012 01:20 AM, Kaya Saman wrote:
Now what I would like to know is, which is better for "virtual
hosting" Maildir or mbox?
Basically my requirement is that I would like to separate users via
either individual folders and then put each user
The only draw back I see with maildir is one file per message. This
it is mostly adventage.
makes it resilient to corruption that mbox sees (if a message gets
corrupted, you erase one message and that corruption won't propagate
even if you leave it in place). In many setups this also leads to
On 06/25/2012 01:52 AM, Kaya Saman wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 8:37 AM, Trever L. Adams
> wrote:
>> On 06/25/2012 01:20 AM, Kaya Saman wrote:
>>
>> Now what I would like to know is, which is better for "virtual
>> hosting" Maildir or mbox?
>>
>>
>> Basically my requirement is that I would lik
On 25 Jun 2012, at 10:44, Charles Marcus wrote:
> On 2012-06-25 3:58 AM, J E Lyon wrote:
>> I've not come up with any significant advantages of mbox that count
>> for much in my experiences and installations . . Would be interested
>> to hear of suggested advantages that I might have overlooked
>
On Mon, 25 Jun 2012 08:52:51 +0100
Kaya Saman wrote:
> To start with the reason I'm not using LDAP is because I couldn't find
> enough information on how to set it up! I did post here a couple of
> times but got no responses.. so I figured it was something that
> people either didn't know or
On 2012-06-25 3:58 AM, J E Lyon wrote:
I've not come up with any significant advantages of mbox that count
for much in my experiences and installations . . Would be interested
to hear of suggested advantages that I might have overlooked
One major advantage of mbox (and now mdbox) over maildir
On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 10:31 AM, Charles Marcus
wrote:
> On 2012-06-25 3:20 AM, Kaya Saman wrote:
>>
>> # cat dovecot.conf
>> # v1.2+:
>> auth_use_winbind = yes
>
>
> Please always only provide output of doveconf -n, not copy/pastes from the
> config files.
>
> This proves (to yourself and every
On 2012-06-25 3:20 AM, Kaya Saman wrote:
# cat dovecot.conf
# v1.2+:
auth_use_winbind = yes
Please always only provide output of doveconf -n, not copy/pastes from
the config files.
This proves (to yourself and everyone else) that you are using the
config that dovecot is actually using - it
On 25 Jun 2012, at 08:52, Kaya Saman wrote:
> I've previously **only** ever worked with Maildir but I was told that there
> are some benefits to mbox which is why I decided to try to use it here!
I used mbox before Dovecot, but once I found Maildir, I never looked back.
I've not come up with an
On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 8:37 AM, Trever L. Adams
wrote:
> On 06/25/2012 01:20 AM, Kaya Saman wrote:
>
> Now what I would like to know is, which is better for "virtual
> hosting" Maildir or mbox?
>
>
> Basically my requirement is that I would like to separate users via
> either individual folders a
On 06/25/2012 01:20 AM, Kaya Saman wrote:
> Now what I would like to know is, which is better for "virtual
> hosting" Maildir or mbox?
>
>
> Basically my requirement is that I would like to separate users via
> either individual folders and then put each user's mbox or Maildir in
> the created dire
On 25 Jun 2012, at 08:20, Kaya Saman wrote:
> Now what I would like to know is, which is better for "virtual
> hosting" Maildir or mbox?
I always use Maildir in preference to mbox . . it's just such a lovely
solution, imho :)
(Mind you, I'm on a *nix server, so filesystem behaviour may be a cons
On 06/25/2012 01:20 AM, Kaya Saman wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm trying to configure a server to use SAMBA and Winbind to
> authenticate to Active Directory I managed to get this portion up
> and running even the Dovecot portion.
>
> For reference something similar to this guide:
>
> http://www.whitneyt
Hi,
I'm trying to configure a server to use SAMBA and Winbind to
authenticate to Active Directory I managed to get this portion up
and running even the Dovecot portion.
For reference something similar to this guide:
http://www.whitneytechnologies.com/?p=119
However PAM is slightly differen
16 matches
Mail list logo
