Re: [Dovecot] Zero-sized Maildir files and index corruption on over-quota

2010-10-14 Thread Timo Sirainen
On Tue, 2010-10-05 at 15:29 +0200, Edgar Fuß wrote: > It looks like all mails which correctly got bounced are >64KB while > those resulting in zero-sized files are <64KB (there is one >32KB). My > first guess would be that maybe for large files, write() fails, while > for small ones, close() fails

Re: [Dovecot] Zero-sized Maildir files and index corruption on over-quota

2010-10-05 Thread Edgar Fuß
> Are your NFS Maildirs mounted on more than one server? Yes. > Check the list archive for "nfs director". I do read the list. > There has been a good bit of discussion about this recently. As I recall, this is about index corruption. What we face is not index corruption, but zero-length data fi

Re: [Dovecot] Zero-sized Maildir files and index corruption on over-quota

2010-10-05 Thread Eric Shubert
Edgar Fuß wrote: We are using Postfix as an MTA delivering via Dovecot's LDA (with sieve). We also use Dovecot as a POP/IMAP server. Mail storage is Maildir on NFS, indexes are stored locally. Quotas are FS quotas enforced by the NFS server. The Dovecot version is 1.2.11. Recently, for one us

[Dovecot] Zero-sized Maildir files and index corruption on over-quota

2010-10-05 Thread Edgar Fuß
We are using Postfix as an MTA delivering via Dovecot's LDA (with sieve). We also use Dovecot as a POP/IMAP server. Mail storage is Maildir on NFS, indexes are stored locally. Quotas are FS quotas enforced by the NFS server. The Dovecot version is 1.2.11. Recently, for one user being over quota