Hi Timo,
Is the dovecot index cache stored only standard header
fields (from, to, cc, subject, content-type... )? What
happen if there is non standard header, will it be cached?
- Joe
May the force be with you..
On Mon, 2007-08-13 at 19:24 +0800, Joe Wong wrote:
> Hi Timo,
>
> Is the dovecot index cache stored only standard header
> fields (from, to, cc, subject, content-type... )? What
> happen if there is non standard header, will it be cached?
Yes. Dovecot caches the headers that a client fetches. No
ot; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc:
Sent: Monday, August 13, 2007 7:51 PM
Subject: Re: [Dovecot] about index cache
ion. :-)
- Joe
- Original Message -
From: "Timo Sirainen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Joe Wong" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "Dovecot Mailing List"
Sent: Monday, August 13, 2007 11:06 PM
Subject: Re: [Dovecot] about index cache
On Mon, Aug 13, 2007 at 06:06:38PM +0300, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> So Dovecot remembers what fields client is interested of and when header
> is being parsed it caches everything that it knows the client wants.
For how long does dovecot remember which headers? e.g. what happens if a
user switches t
On Mon, 2007-08-13 at 23:18 +0800, Joe Wong wrote:
> Hi Timo,
>
> Not necessarily. It goes like this:
>
> 1. mailbox is newly created
> 2. a new mail arrives
> 3. Client does FETCH 1 (BODY.PEEK[HEADER.FIELDS (From)])
> --> Dovecot caches From header
> 4. Client does FETCH 1 (BODY.PEEK[HEADER.FIE
On Mon, 2007-08-13 at 22:22 +0800, Joe Wong wrote:
> Hi Timo,
>
> I see. So, if the client fetch the From field at the first time and then
> fetch the subject field at the second time, the index.cache file will be
> updated twice?
Not necessarily. It goes like this:
1. mailbox is newly created
On Mon, 2007-08-13 at 17:23 +0200, Geert Hendrickx wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 13, 2007 at 06:06:38PM +0300, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> > So Dovecot remembers what fields client is interested of and when header
> > is being parsed it caches everything that it knows the client wants.
>
> For how long does dov
Hi Timo,
Am I right that if the client fetch body.peek[header], no caching of
header fields will be done?
Regards,
- joe
On Mon, 13 Aug 2007, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On Mon, 2007-08-13 at 23:18 +0800, Joe Wong wrote:
> > Hi Timo,
> >
> > Not necessarily. It goes like this:
> >
> > 1. mailbox
On Tue, 2007-08-14 at 10:32 +0800, Joe Wong wrote:
> Hi Timo,
>
> Am I right that if the client fetch body.peek[header], no caching of
> header fields will be done?
Right.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
10 matches
Mail list logo
