On 04/01/2010 03:28, Bob Eastbrook wrote:
Hi all,
Thanks for the suggestions. It sounds like the consensus is that I
should avoid polling with POP or IMAP and deal with incoming messages
directly.
I think it depends on your expected load and the results of a few
benchmarks...
The
Hi all,
Thanks for the suggestions. It sounds like the consensus is that I
should avoid polling with POP or IMAP and deal with incoming messages
directly.
Bob
Hi,
Don't use POP3 or IMAP; instead deliver the messages to a command. For
example, GNU Mailman is mailing list software which pipes each incoming
list message to a Python script. That command can then perform the
necessary processing.
I don't know what you had in mind, but if the messages can
Hello,
Actually, thousands of customers would send order emails to a system
running postifx. All orders end up in ord...@example.com. Then,
another app fetches these emails via Dovecot (POP or IMAP), ideally at
the rate of 1000 per second.
I think it might be difficult to accomplish
On 2010-01-01 8:01 PM, Michael wrote:
On Sat, 02 Jan 2010 11:09:33 Bob Eastbrook wrote:
Can anyone describe an architecture which can handle 1000 IMAP or POP
messages per second? Ideally, it would be hosted in the cloud and
additional instances could be launched to handle additional load.
Can anyone describe an architecture which can handle 1000 IMAP or POP
messages per second? Ideally, it would be hosted in the cloud and
additional instances could be launched to handle additional load.
Bob
On Fri, Jan 1, 2010 at 2:09 PM, Bob Eastbrook baconeater...@gmail.com wrote:
Can anyone describe an architecture which can handle 1000 IMAP or POP
messages per second? Ideally, it would be hosted in the cloud and
additional instances could be launched to handle additional load.
More
On 1.1.2010, at 17.23, Bob Eastbrook wrote:
More information: imagine an app which processes orders for concert
tickets via email. The app connects to a server via POP or IMAP,
downloads orders, and then deletes them from the server. There aren't
thousands of users simultaneously accessing
On Fri, Jan 1, 2010 at 11:23 PM, Bob Eastbrook baconeater...@gmail.comwrote:
On Fri, Jan 1, 2010 at 2:09 PM, Bob Eastbrook baconeater...@gmail.com
wrote:
Can anyone describe an architecture which can handle 1000 IMAP or POP
messages per second? Ideally, it would be hosted in the cloud and
On Fri, Jan 1, 2010 at 3:07 PM, Thomas Løcke thomas.granv...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Bob,
Just to make sure I understand you: Some app is sending emails to
ord...@example.com at the rate of 1000 per second, and another app is
fetching email from ord...@example.com to process them?
Hello,
On 1.1.2010, at 18.15, Bob Eastbrook wrote:
I think it might be difficult to accomplish this via POP since I think
Dovecot would have to lock the account while doing the POP downloads.
This makes it difficult to have more than one app downloading at a
time.
The locking behavior is optional,
On Sat, 02 Jan 2010 11:09:33 Bob Eastbrook wrote:
Can anyone describe an architecture which can handle 1000 IMAP or POP
messages per second? Ideally, it would be hosted in the cloud and
additional instances could be launched to handle additional load.
Bob
The Courier IMAP server is a fast,
Bob Eastbrook wrote:
On Fri, Jan 1, 2010 at 3:07 PM, Thomas Løcke thomas.granv...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Bob,
Just to make sure I understand you: Some app is sending emails to
ord...@example.com at the rate of 1000 per second, and another app is
fetching email from ord...@example.com to process
13 matches
Mail list logo
