On 12.7.2012, at 13.32, Nick Edwards wrote:
Do you intend to introduce bcrypt into the built in password schemes?
No, but I would accept a patch for that.
On Sun, 2012-07-15 at 11:32 -0700, Robin wrote:
Indeed. What I have seen is a create deal of variation in the
configuration (/etc/login.defs or your distro's equivalent) in terms of
making use of such things.
I don't see any added value to bcrypt over iterated SHA-512, really, and
On 16/07/2012 11:05, Noel Butler wrote:
On Sun, 2012-07-15 at 11:32 -0700, Robin wrote:
Indeed. What I have seen is a create deal of variation in the
configuration (/etc/login.defs or your distro's equivalent) in terms of
making use of such things.
I don't see any added value to bcrypt over
bump
On 7/12/12, Nick Edwards nick.z.edwa...@gmail.com wrote:
Dear Timo,
Do you intend to introduce bcrypt into the built in password schemes?
In lew of all these hacks lately many larger companies appear moving
this way, we are looking at it too, but dovecot will then be the
weakest link
On 7/12/12, Nick Edwards nick.z.edwa...@gmail.com wrote:
Dear Timo,
Do you intend to introduce bcrypt into the built in password schemes?
In lew of all these hacks lately many larger companies appear moving
this way, we are looking at it too, but dovecot will then be the
weakest link in the
On 7/15/2012 2:14 AM, Ed W wrote:
Interestingly, there doesn't seem to be so much difference between
iterated sha-512 (sha512crypt) and bcrypt. Based on looking at latest
john the ripper results (although I'm a bit confused because they don't
seem to quote the baseline results using the normal
Dear Timo,
Do you intend to introduce bcrypt into the built in password schemes?
In lew of all these hacks lately many larger companies appear moving
this way, we are looking at it too, but dovecot will then be the
weakest link in the database security.
So, are you planning on this and if so
