Surely spam filtering/rejection should be done by the MTA, preferably during the
SMTP protocol conversation so as to prevent the black-holing of legitimate
e-mails (i.e. the sender doesn't know it's not been delivered) and the
prevention of joe-job collateral spamming?
It should also be noted
On Sat, 2008-04-19 at 15:12 +0200, Alexander Prinsier wrote:
> Johannes Berg wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> >> I'm trying to build another antispam plugin, but some things are a bit
> >> unclear.
> >
> > What are you trying to achieve? Just build another backend for my
> > antispam plugin?
> Yes, just anot
Johannes Berg wrote:
> Hi,
>
>> I'm trying to build another antispam plugin, but some things are a bit
>> unclear.
>
> What are you trying to achieve? Just build another backend for my
> antispam plugin?
Yes, just another backend. It would be logging the signatures to a mysql
database, so that I
Hi,
> I'm trying to build another antispam plugin, but some things are a bit
> unclear.
What are you trying to achieve? Just build another backend for my
antispam plugin?
> In backend_handle_mail I put store the signature returned from
> signature_extract into my antispam_transaction_context. In
Hello,
I'm trying to build another antispam plugin, but some things are a bit
unclear.
In backend_handle_mail I put store the signature returned from
signature_extract into my antispam_transaction_context. In
backend_commit it appears that the signature is empty. (It wasn't in
backend_handle_mail
