I think I broke the thread.
It was a follow up of this post from May 12:
>I try to create a shared directory in dovecot. When accessing ( from
>roundcube) i can't subscribe or list the namespace. It looks like I don't
>have rights.
>This is an extract from debug log: When I try to create a n
> callback = 0x42909f , failure_callback =
> 0x429275 , request_auth_token = 1}
> service_flags = MASTER_SERVICE_FLAG_KEEP_CONFIG_OPEN
> storage_service_flags = MAIL_STORAGE_SERVICE_FLAG_DISALLOW_ROOT
> username = 0x0
> c = -1
That means dovecot try to fi
On Wednesday 14 May 2014 08:31:57 you wrote:
> On Wednesday 14 May 2014 01:02:28 you wrote:
>
Finally i found time to build another machine and try to debug :
I found my slackbuild stripped the debug symbols so i made some changes and :
Program terminated with signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
On 13.5.2014, at 10.21, Mihai Badici wrote:
> I try to create a shared directory in dovecot.
> When accessing ( from roundcube) i can't subscribe or list the namespace.
> It looks like I don't have rights.
>
> This is an extract from debug log:
> When I try to create a new folder in "Public" (i
I try to create a shared directory in dovecot.
When accessing ( from roundcube) i can't subscribe or list the namespace.
It looks like I don't have rights.
This is an extract from debug log:
When I try to create a new folder in "Public" (i don't have rights, but i can
try) loooks like the process
On 3.7.2012, at 9.18, Asheesh Laroia wrote:
>> I'm still not ready to give ABI or even API guarantees to libdovecot.. There
>> are still several important large changes to do and I don't really want to
>> keep a ton of ugly backwards compatibility stuff just for external users of
>> the library
On Tue, 3 Jul 2012, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On 3.7.2012, at 8.53, Asheesh Laroia wrote:
I see there is a dovecot shared library. I haven't looked into the
details, but here are things I'm interested in:
1. Replacing libc-client's use as a client library
..
I envision creating libdovecot-c-clie
On 3.7.2012, at 8.53, Asheesh Laroia wrote:
> I see there is a dovecot shared library. I haven't looked into the
> details, but here are things I'm interested in:
>
> 1. Replacing libc-client's use as a client library
..
> I envision creating libdovecot-c-client-alike that is a set of headers
>
Hi all Dovecotters,
Lots of programs (e.g, PHP) link to a library called c-client, which is
a derivative of the original IMAP implementation, UW IMAP.
(For those new to UW IMAP, read here: http://www.washington.edu/imap/ )
UW IMAP is not in as much of active development as it used to be, so I
On Fri, 2011-05-06 at 17:03 +0400, Alexey Eropkin wrote:
> And all seems ok, but I cannot understand how to make delet flag per user.
> If I permit t and e in ACL, users delet message forever for all.
Not possible currently. Although you could easily modify the source code
to do that.
Hi all.
I have dovecot 1.2.15 on debian + mysql+shared folders.
My config
login_process_size = 128
login_processes_count = 10
login_process_per_connection = no
login_max_connections = 3000
login_max_processes_count = 1000
mail_process_size = 1024
protocols = imap imaps pop3 pop3s managesieve
p
On Wed, 2009-12-30 at 09:43 -0500, Frank Cusack wrote:
> Which brings me to another question. How is the filename manipulated
> when there are private flags?
They aren't. The shared flags are in the filename. The private flags are
only in index files.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digi
On December 29, 2009 3:03:56 AM -0500 Frank Cusack
wrote:
I was just thinking today it would be nice to have per-USER private or
shared. So e.g. all users by default might share \Seen \Answered but
some admin users have private \Seen, and don't have to worry about
resetting the \Seen flag when
On December 29, 2009 4:49:56 PM -0500 Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Tue, 2009-12-29 at 03:03 -0500, Frank Cusack wrote:
On December 29, 2009 1:59:53 AM -0500 Timo Sirainen wrote:
> Yeah, that's been in todo for a while. I'd probably make dovecot-shared
> file have options:
I was just thinking today
On Tue, 2009-12-29 at 03:03 -0500, Frank Cusack wrote:
> On December 29, 2009 1:59:53 AM -0500 Timo Sirainen wrote:
> > Yeah, that's been in todo for a while. I'd probably make dovecot-shared
> > file have options:
>
> I was just thinking today it would be nice to have per-USER private or
> share
On December 29, 2009 1:59:53 AM -0500 Timo Sirainen wrote:
Yeah, that's been in todo for a while. I'd probably make dovecot-shared
file have options:
I was just thinking today it would be nice to have per-USER private or
shared. So e.g. all users by default might share \Seen \Answered but
som
On 28.12.2009, at 2.08, Frank Cusack wrote:
> I'm confused about dovecot-shared.
>
> If the file exists, \SEEN flags are NOT shared?
Right.
> So if dovecot-shared exists, flags are actually private. The doc
> seems clear on this (albeit not worded very well). I only question it
> because intu
I'm confused about dovecot-shared.
If the file exists, \SEEN flags are NOT shared?
So if dovecot-shared exists, flags are actually private. The doc
seems clear on this (albeit not worded very well). I only question it
because intuitively you would think the opposite. If backwards
compatibilit
backports.org has v1.2 debs.
On Dec 3, 2009, at 1:54 AM, Darius Bohni wrote:
> is the dovecot version 1.2 fully compatible with debian lenny? its only the
> 1.0.15 version in the main repo.
>
>
> On Thu, Dec 3, 2009 at 1:29 AM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
>
>> On Dec 2, 2009, at 9:25 AM, Darius Bohn
is the dovecot version 1.2 fully compatible with debian lenny? its only the
1.0.15 version in the main repo.
On Thu, Dec 3, 2009 at 1:29 AM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On Dec 2, 2009, at 9:25 AM, Darius Bohni wrote:
>
> > I try to set up dovecot with imap and maildir. I run into a permission
> > pr
On ons 02 dec 2009 22:48:36 CET, Darius Bohni wrote
i don't use root for various security reasons. i dont understand what
imapsync is good for my backup?
rsync all files, exclude mailfiles in rsync
in imapsync sync all mails with same auth to another host eg same host
you do rsync to
my d
On ons 02 dec 2009 22:27:34 CET, Frank Cusack wrote
On December 2, 2009 9:58:59 PM +0100 Benny Pedersen wrote:
On ons 02 dec 2009 17:37:54 CET, Frank Cusack wrote
On December 2, 2009 4:25:35 PM +0100 Darius Bohni
wrote:
I need to have read and execute rights of all folders and mails for the
On Dec 2, 2009, at 9:25 AM, Darius Bohni wrote:
> I try to set up dovecot with imap and maildir. I run into a permission
> problem.
> I need to have read and execute rights of all folders and mails for the
> group (needed by the backup deamon).
Easiest solution: Upgrade to Dovecot v1.2 and just s
i don't use root for various security reasons. i dont understand what
imapsync is good for my backup?
my deamon is coming with rsync from an other host.
grz
fr3ak4l
On Wed, Dec 2, 2009 at 10:27 PM, Frank Cusack wrote:
> On December 2, 2009 9:58:59 PM +0100 Benny Pedersen wrote:
>
>> On ons 02
On December 2, 2009 9:58:59 PM +0100 Benny Pedersen wrote:
On ons 02 dec 2009 17:37:54 CET, Frank Cusack wrote
On December 2, 2009 4:25:35 PM +0100 Darius Bohni
wrote:
I need to have read and execute rights of all folders and mails for the
group (needed by the backup deamon).
I don't under
On ons 02 dec 2009 17:37:54 CET, Frank Cusack wrote
On December 2, 2009 4:25:35 PM +0100 Darius Bohni wrote:
I need to have read and execute rights of all folders and mails for the
group (needed by the backup deamon).
I don't understand how a backup daemon could work if it isn't run as
root.
On December 2, 2009 4:25:35 PM +0100 Darius Bohni wrote:
I need to have read and execute rights of all folders and mails for the
group (needed by the backup deamon).
I don't understand how a backup daemon could work if it isn't run as
root.
-frank
Hi,
first, sorry for my english, i hope u understand me :-/
I try to set up dovecot with imap and maildir. I run into a permission
problem.
I need to have read and execute rights of all folders and mails for the
group (needed by the backup deamon).
first I tried with umask, but this only affect
On Thu, 2009-10-29 at 16:16 -0500, Dave wrote:
> >> (b) Indicate to Dovecot in some way other than the dovecot-shared file
> >> which permissions to use for any messages created?
> >
> > In v1.2 the permissions are taken from parent directory.
>
> Hmm, that might be the best solution then, an u
>> (b) Indicate to Dovecot in some way other than the dovecot-shared file
>> which permissions to use for any messages created?
>
> In v1.2 the permissions are taken from parent directory.
Hmm, that might be the best solution then, an upgrade to 1.2. Fwiw, I
also tried NOT using the dovecot-sha
On Wed, 2009-10-28 at 16:21 -0500, Dave wrote:
> (Running Dovecot 1.1.0) Is it possible to either -
>
> (a) Still have shared "\Seen" flags even while using the dovecot-shared file
Not currently.
> (b) Indicate to Dovecot in some way other than the dovecot-shared file
> which permissions to us
(Running Dovecot 1.1.0) Is it possible to either -
(a) Still have shared "\Seen" flags even while using the dovecot-shared file
or
(b) Indicate to Dovecot in some way other than the dovecot-shared file
which permissions to use for any messages created?
The problem is, in my shared folder (usi
>> Now, I have gotten the shared boxes to work IF I changed the permissions
>> to be rwx for user and group on /home/imapuser/Maildir/*, but this makes
>> procmail (and .procmailrc) unhappy
>
> You'll need to set UNIX permissions in a way that it works.
Thank you for the responses! OK, it seems
On Tue, 2009-10-27 at 14:51 -0500, Dave wrote:
> Now, I have gotten the shared boxes to work IF I changed the permissions
> to be rwx for user and group on /home/imapuser/Maildir/*, but this makes
> procmail (and .procmailrc) unhappy and it starts sending things to mbox
> files (old system) instead
Hello!
I think, if you keep maildirs by different uid then you must change file
permissons to permit access to shared maildir.
I don`t now about procmail delivery options, but in dovecots "deliver" -
if you create in shared maildir file called "dovecot-shared", than
deliver will keep permission
Hello! I just joined the list and will be happy to help where I can in
my limited experience, but also come to the table with a question. I
think there's something I'm missing regarding shared mailboxes and ACLs,
so I will describe my situation and see if I am understanding correctly
(running Do
On Tue, 2009-03-24 at 15:32 +0900, Jorgen Lundman wrote:
> "domain quotas" is a good way to describe it.
>
> It would need some method to look up all mail-storage that is belong to
> the domain. In our case, we would look at an LDAP query, where uid=uid
> and gid=gid, but could be a literal sear
With v1.2 this would be somewhat easier I think, because it allows you
to create new user structures, look up their home dirs (by querying
dovecot-auth) and calculate their quotas. But you'd still need a way to
get a list of usernames who share the quota.
All of this is actually related to "do
Well.. With dict quota you could already do this, but quota
recalculation wouldn't work right. Quota recalculation shouldn't happen
normally though, so you might get away with it. But to fix quota
recalculation you'd have to do something like you're describing I
guess..
With v1.2 this would be som
Since I could issue an LDAP query for
(&(uidNumber=%uid)(gidNumber=%gid)) for homeDirectory to retrieve all
home directory paths, and associated mailDirSize files, I wonder if I
could extend dovecot to allow us to handle shared quota like the
fs-quota used to work.
Using symlinks between ac
On Fri, 2009-01-30 at 16:49 +0100, Thomas Hummel wrote:
> Hello Timo,
>
> About the dovecot-shared file, the wiki says :
>
> "Unless you're using a single UID for all the users, you'll need to have a
>dovecot-shared file in each shared maildir. The group and the file
> permissions
>for
Hello Timo,
About the dovecot-shared file, the wiki says :
"Unless you're using a single UID for all the users, you'll need to have a
dovecot-shared file in each shared maildir. The group and the file
permissions
for new files inside the maildir are taken from the dovecot-shared file."
Hello list,
We are in the process of exploring the idea of moving from UFS with
fs-quota to using softquotas in Dovecot (probably Maildir type, stored
in LDAP, all ontop of NFS).
I have it setup, and it works rather well so far.
But there is one situation we can currently support, which I c
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, 5 Jul 2007, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Wed, 2007-07-04 at 16:50 +0200, Steffen Kaiser wrote:
drwxrws--- 5 31045 30005 4096 2007-07-04 15:53 ./
drwxrwsr-x 2 31045 30005 4096 2007-06-21 12:19 cur/
The setuid-group bit hides group-x bit. The on
On Thu, 2007-07-05 at 17:43 +0300, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On Wed, 2007-07-04 at 16:50 +0200, Steffen Kaiser wrote:
> > drwxrws--- 5 31045 30005 4096 2007-07-04 15:53 ./
> > drwxrwsr-x 2 31045 30005 4096 2007-06-21 12:19 cur/
>
> The setuid-group bit hides group-x bit. The only thing I can think of
Den 05-07-2007 16:43, Timo Sirainen skrev:
On Wed, 2007-07-04 at 16:50 +0200, Steffen Kaiser wrote:
drwxrws--- 5 31045 30005 4096 2007-07-04 15:53 ./
drwxrwsr-x 2 31045 30005 4096 2007-06-21 12:19 cur/
The setuid-group bit hides group-x bit. The only thing I can think of is
cur/ isn't group-ex
On Wed, 2007-07-04 at 16:50 +0200, Steffen Kaiser wrote:
> drwxrws--- 5 31045 30005 4096 2007-07-04 15:53 ./
> drwxrwsr-x 2 31045 30005 4096 2007-06-21 12:19 cur/
The setuid-group bit hides group-x bit. The only thing I can think of is
cur/ isn't group-executable.
signature.asc
Description: Th
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, 4 Jul 2007, Steffen Kaiser wrote:
# l /mnt/mailcache/shared/.testAccess -n
total 24
drwxrws--- 5 31045 30005 4096 2007-07-04 15:53 ./
drwxr-xr-x 6 0 0 4096 2007-07-04 16:08 ../
drwxrwsr-x 2 31045 30005 4096 2007-06-21 12:19 cur/
-rw-
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello,
I've set up a namespace to share some mailboxes.
When I try to select them, I get an internal error:
Client-server chat:
* OK Dovecot ready.
1 login dvtest2 x
1 OK Logged in.
2 list "" *
* LIST (\HasNoChildren) "." "Trash"
* LIST (\HasChild
On Mon, Jun 04, 2007 at 03:47:13PM +0300, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Sun, 2007-06-03 at 23:05 -0400, Adam McDougall wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 04, 2007 at 05:57:49AM +0300, Timo Sirainen wrote:
>
> On Thu, 2007-05-24 at 18:59 -0400, Adam McDougall wrote:
> > May 24 18:45:35 hostname dovecot:
On Sun, 2007-06-03 at 23:05 -0400, Adam McDougall wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 04, 2007 at 05:57:49AM +0300, Timo Sirainen wrote:
>
> On Thu, 2007-05-24 at 18:59 -0400, Adam McDougall wrote:
> > May 24 18:45:35 hostname dovecot: IMAP(username):
> >
> fchown(/home/username/Maildir/dovecot/public/co
On Mon, Jun 04, 2007 at 05:57:49AM +0300, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Thu, 2007-05-24 at 18:59 -0400, Adam McDougall wrote:
> May 24 18:45:35 hostname dovecot: IMAP(username):
>
fchown(/home/username/Maildir/dovecot/public/control/org/.mailfolder/dovecot-uidlist)
failed:
> Operation not pe
On Thu, 2007-05-24 at 18:59 -0400, Adam McDougall wrote:
> May 24 18:45:35 hostname dovecot: IMAP(username):
> fchown(/home/username/Maildir/dovecot/public/control/org/.mailfolder/dovecot-uidlist)
> failed:
> Operation not permitted
I'm not sure if you already figured this out, but these calls
I have some public mailboxes setup in 1.0.0,
location =
maildir:/egr/mail/shared/org:CONTROL=%h/Maildir/dovecot/public/control/org:INDEX=%h/Maildir/dovecot/public/indexes/org
I also have a dovecot-shared file in the maildir folders so messages that are
added
to the inbox get a decent set of def
On Fri, 2007-05-18 at 16:22 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> So, I'm working on a shared folder. Everything is nice except for one bit.
>
> My dovecot-shared file in the Maildir is either being ignored, or doesn't
> work the way I think it does. Any messages copied into the Maildir using a
> m
So, I'm working on a shared folder. Everything is nice except for one bit.
My dovecot-shared file in the Maildir is either being ignored, or doesn't
work the way I think it does. Any messages copied into the Maildir using a
mail client are mode 660 and owned by the user who did the copy. Perms
56 matches
Mail list logo
