Re: [Dovecot] dovecot 2.0 fails self-tests

2010-03-26 Thread Timo Sirainen
On Fri, 2010-03-26 at 16:29 +0200, Timo Sirainen wrote: > ==18666== Conditional jump or move depends on uninitialised value(s) > ==18666==at 0x402AFF: message_decoder_decode_next_block > (message-decoder.c:148) > > Yeah, looks like there's a bug. Well, that was a simple fix: http://hg.doveco

Re: [Dovecot] dovecot 2.0 fails self-tests

2010-03-26 Thread Timo Sirainen
On Fri, 2010-03-26 at 16:28 +0200, Timo Sirainen wrote: > > message_date_parse(7) : ok > > 0 / 8 tests failed > > test-message-decoder.c:67: Assert failed: > > message_decoder_decode_next_block(ctx, &input, &output) > > I can't reproduce this with

Re: [Dovecot] dovecot 2.0 fails self-tests

2010-03-26 Thread Timo Sirainen
On Fri, 2010-03-26 at 14:13 +0100, Michal Hlavinka wrote: > Hi, > > is it expected that dovecot 2.0.beta4 pass all of it's self-tests or some > failures are normal? Tarballs are built with "make distcheck", which would fail if any of the self-tests failed. > message_date_parse(7) ..

[Dovecot] dovecot 2.0 fails self-tests

2010-03-26 Thread Michal Hlavinka
Hi, is it expected that dovecot 2.0.beta4 pass all of it's self-tests or some failures are normal? I've tried make check and everything passed up to this test: ... message_date_parse(7) : ok 0 / 8 tests failed test-message-decoder.c:67: Assert fai