On Mon, May 09, 2011 at 10:02:06AM +0100, Spyros Tsiolis wrote:
> How exactly would I place an ACL ?
> Should I check the dovecot docs for this ?
Following ACL should do the trick when placed in the folder:
--- [Maildir/.folder/dovecot-acl] ---
owner lrwspi
This will allow adding new messages t
--- On Mon, 9/5/11, Thomas Leuxner wrote:
> From: Thomas Leuxner
> Subject: Re: [Dovecot] dovecot user lost entire folder
> To: dovecot@dovecot.org
> Date: Monday, 9 May, 2011, 11:55
> On Mon, May 09, 2011 at 09:44:46AM
> +0100, Spyros Tsiolis wrote:
>
> > I c
--- On Mon, 9/5/11, Maarten Bezemer wrote:
> From: Maarten Bezemer
> Subject: Re: [Dovecot] dovecot user lost entire folder
> To: "Spyros Tsiolis"
> Cc: "Thomas Leuxner" , "Dovecot"
> Date: Monday, 9 May, 2011, 11:55
> Hi,
>
> On Mon,
Hi,
On Mon, 9 May 2011, Spyros Tsiolis wrote:
I checked all the hidden files underneath
maildir:/var/MailRoot/domains/%d/%n/Maildir
and coudn't find this specific folder.
Checking for specific emails could help.
On the other hand, having backups handy would be nice. That would not only
be h
On Mon, May 09, 2011 at 09:44:46AM +0100, Spyros Tsiolis wrote:
> I checked all the hidden files underneath
> maildir:/var/MailRoot/domains/%d/%n/Maildir
> and coudn't find this specific folder.
Hi Spyros,
do you happen to have a backup of the Maildir structure? You could
simply restore the fol
--- On Mon, 9/5/11, Thomas Leuxner wrote:
> From: Thomas Leuxner
> Subject: Re: [Dovecot] dovecot user lost entire folder
> To: dovecot@dovecot.org
> Date: Monday, 9 May, 2011, 11:03
> On Mon, May 09, 2011 at 08:31:18AM
> +0100, Spyros Tsiolis wrote:
>
> > ma
On Mon, May 09, 2011 at 08:31:18AM +0100, Spyros Tsiolis wrote:
> mail_location: maildir:/var/MailRoot/domains/%d/%n/Maildir
Did you verify in the Maildir structure for that user?
Maildir/.folder
Maildir/.folder.subfolder
http://wiki.dovecot.org/MailLocation/Maildir
Regards
Thomas
signature.
Hello kind people,
OK, today is a bad day for me.
A user from a clients' site called early in the morning to inform
me that she lost an entire folder on thunderbird with (naturally)
important stuff in it.
I am trying to find the lost folder, but there is nowhere to be
found.
Any ideas would grea
On 03/26/2010 11:47 PM Timo Sirainen wrote:
> Well, I made this a poll. Please vote. :) http://blog.dovecot.org/
The result:
* dovein###[23] (31.94%)
* doveless ###[15] (20.83%)
* dovenull ###[34]### (47.22%)
Regards,
Pascal
--
The tr
On Mar 27, 2010, at 3:59 AM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On 27.3.2010, at 12.32, Patrick Wallura wrote:
What about dovedevil and doveangel. Sorry just kidding
Even if not, the problem with those is that the name is longer than
8 characters, which makes them not show up in all ps outputs.
doveu
On 27.3.2010, at 12.32, Patrick Wallura wrote:
> What about dovedevil and doveangel. Sorry just kidding
Even if not, the problem with those is that the name is longer than 8
characters, which makes them not show up in all ps outputs.
Am 25.03.2010 19:30, schrieb Timo Sirainen:
I think the next v2.0 release (rc1?) will include the new changed
default_login_user. I'm still not completely sure what it is though. Two
more ideas:
"dovenest" (by Pascal Volk) - although reminds me a bit too much of
lovenest :)
What about dovedev
Timo Sirainen put forth on 3/27/2010 2:18 AM:
> On Sat, 2010-03-27 at 02:10 -0500, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
>>> Maybe the native english speakers (and I'd think only a subset of them
>>> too). I had never heard of dovetail.
>>
>> I'm guessing that's because you're not a woodworker, or know any. ;) It
On Sat, 2010-03-27 at 00:01 -0500, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
> Noel Butler put forth on 3/26/2010 8:12 PM:
>
> > Nice Marco...
> > OK, Timo, we must have a winner here with " dovenull", surely :P
>
> I fear anything with "null" in it will be confusing to people
> not-in-the-know. The average OP may
Sorry, meant this to go to the list.
Timo Sirainen put forth on 3/27/2010 12:08 AM:
> On 27.3.2010, at 6.49, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
>
>>> Tail just doesn't make much sense to me. Also it's not completely free
>>> of pornographic associations either. :)
>>
>> No, no, totally free of pornographic co
On 27.3.2010, at 7.01, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
> Noel Butler put forth on 3/26/2010 8:12 PM:
>
>> Nice Marco...
>> OK, Timo, we must have a winner here with " dovenull", surely :P
>
> I fear anything with "null" in it will be confusing to people
> not-in-the-know. The average OP may see that proc
On 27.3.2010, at 6.49, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
>> Tail just doesn't make much sense to me. Also it's not completely free
>> of pornographic associations either. :)
>
> No, no, totally free of pornographic connotation. Dovetail is a type of
> woodworking joint. That's what the vast majority of peop
Noel Butler put forth on 3/26/2010 8:12 PM:
> Nice Marco...
> OK, Timo, we must have a winner here with " dovenull", surely :P
I fear anything with "null" in it will be confusing to people
not-in-the-know. The average OP may see that process name and think it's a
dovecot trashcan for various un
Timo Sirainen put forth on 3/26/2010 5:47 PM:
> Well, I made this a poll. Please vote. :) http://blog.dovecot.org/
>
> I only added those options that I thought people might have a chance of
> understanding what it could possibly mean.
Add "dovel" and restart the vote. Short, sweet, to the point
Timo Sirainen put forth on 3/26/2010 7:36 AM:
> On Fri, 2010-03-26 at 20:01 +1000, Noel Butler wrote:
> "dovehole" - you go inside dovecot via a hole, right?
That is downright pornographic. "dovehole" - "lovehole"?
"dovenest" isn't totally horrible (close), but "dovehole" i
On Fri, 2010-03-26 at 15:32 +0100, Marco Nenciarini wrote:
> Timo Sirainen ha scritto:
> > On Fri, 2010-03-26 at 20:01 +1000, Noel Butler wrote:
> > "dovehole" - you go inside dovecot via a hole, right?
> That is downright pornographic. "dovehole" - "lovehole"?
>
> "dovenest" i
Well, I made this a poll. Please vote. :) http://blog.dovecot.org/
I only added those options that I thought people might have a chance of
understanding what it could possibly mean.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
On 03/26/2010 05:48 AM Stan Hoeppner wrote:
> Timo Sirainen put forth on 3/25/2010 1:30 PM:
>> …
>> "dovenest" (by Pascal Volk) - although reminds me a bit too much of
>> lovenest :)
>> …
>
> That is downright pornographic. "dovehole" - "lovehole"?
>
> "dovenest" isn't totally horrible (close),
On 2010-03-26 8:36 AM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> So my last idea: doveless. "It's less of a dovecot process." To me it
> seems closer to perfect as anything I've seen so far.
I liked doveauth, but understand why it might be confusing...
Here are some other suggestion...
doveuser
dovein
doveme
do
On Fri, 26 Mar 2010 16:18:23 +0100 (CET), Steffen Kaiser
articulated:
> On Fri, 26 Mar 2010, Marco Nenciarini wrote:
> >> "dovehole" - you go inside dovecot via a hole, right?
> > That is downright pornographic. "dovehole" - "lovehole"?
> >
> > "dovenest" isn't totally horrible (
On Fri, Mar 26, 2010 at 11:17:26AM -0400, Tony Rutherford wrote:
> Well...I'll throw my silly hat into the ring:
> "doveman"
Haha. That sounds like "Duffman"
Regards
Thomas
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, 26 Mar 2010, Marco Nenciarini wrote:
"dovehole" - you go inside dovecot via a hole, right?
That is downright pornographic. "dovehole" - "lovehole"?
"dovenest" isn't totally horrible (close), but "dovehole" is ...
just not
right at all.
d
On 3/26/2010 10:32 AM, Marco Nenciarini wrote:
Timo Sirainen ha scritto:
On Fri, 2010-03-26 at 20:01 +1000, Noel Butler wrote:
"dovehole" - you go inside dovecot via a hole, right?
That is downright pornographic. "dovehole" - "lovehole"?
"dovenest" isn't totally horri
Timo Sirainen ha scritto:
> On Fri, 2010-03-26 at 20:01 +1000, Noel Butler wrote:
> "dovehole" - you go inside dovecot via a hole, right?
That is downright pornographic. "dovehole" - "lovehole"?
"dovenest" isn't totally horrible (close), but "dovehole" is ...
just not
>>>
On Fri, 2010-03-26 at 20:01 +1000, Noel Butler wrote:
> > >> "dovehole" - you go inside dovecot via a hole, right?
> > >
> > > That is downright pornographic. "dovehole" - "lovehole"?
> > >
> > > "dovenest" isn't totally horrible (close), but "dovehole" is ...
> > > just not
> > > right at all.
On Thu, 2010-03-25 at 21:50 -0700, Bradley Giesbrecht wrote:
> On Mar 25, 2010, at 9:48 PM, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
>
> > Timo Sirainen put forth on 3/25/2010 1:30 PM:
> >> I think the next v2.0 release (rc1?) will include the new changed
> >> default_login_user. I'm still not completely sure what i
On Mar 25, 2010, at 9:50 PM, Bradley Giesbrecht > wrote:
On Mar 25, 2010, at 9:48 PM, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
Timo Sirainen put forth on 3/25/2010 1:30 PM:
I think the next v2.0 release (rc1?) will include the new changed
default_login_user. I'm still not completely sure what it is
though.
-Terry
Sent from my iPhone
On Mar 25, 2010, at 9:50 PM, Bradley Giesbrecht > wrote:
On Mar 25, 2010, at 9:48 PM, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
Timo Sirainen put forth on 3/25/2010 1:30 PM:
I think the next v2.0 release (rc1?) will include the new changed
default_login_user. I'm still not complet
On Mar 25, 2010, at 9:48 PM, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
Timo Sirainen put forth on 3/25/2010 1:30 PM:
I think the next v2.0 release (rc1?) will include the new changed
default_login_user. I'm still not completely sure what it is
though. Two
more ideas:
"dovenest" (by Pascal Volk) - although remi
Timo Sirainen put forth on 3/25/2010 1:30 PM:
> I think the next v2.0 release (rc1?) will include the new changed
> default_login_user. I'm still not completely sure what it is though. Two
> more ideas:
>
> "dovenest" (by Pascal Volk) - although reminds me a bit too much of
> lovenest :)
>
> "dov
doveegg? dove_egg?
I think the next v2.0 release (rc1?) will include the new changed
default_login_user. I'm still not completely sure what it is though. Two
more ideas:
"dovenest" (by Pascal Volk) - although reminds me a bit too much of
lovenest :)
"dovehole" - you go inside dovecot via a hole, right?
On Sat, 201
Quoting David Halik :
Well, I don't know how you feel about it, but you could always go
with something similar to what courier does and call it "doveauth"
while keeping the real "dovecot" user for the reset of the processes.
+1
--
Eric Rostetter
The Department of Physics
The University of
On Sat, 2010-01-23 at 10:33 -0500, David Halik wrote:
> Well, I don't know how you feel about it, but you could always go with
> something similar to what courier does and call it "doveauth" while
> keeping the real "dovecot" user for the reset of the processes.
>
> It's eight characters, remind
Well, I don't know how you feel about it, but you could always go with
something similar to what courier does and call it "doveauth" while
keeping the real "dovecot" user for the reset of the processes.
It's eight characters, reminds you of the login process, and very easy
to understand for
On 23.01.10 14:21, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> Sure they're already configurable in dovecot.conf, but there needs
> to be defaults.
So far, I have been content with the default user and have thus failed
to notice the "login_user" setting. My bad.
-Ralph
On Sat, 2010-01-23 at 14:19 +0100, Ralph Seichter wrote:
> You could use "dovecotl" (lower-case "l" as the eighth character) which
> as a nice Aztec ring. ;-) Seriously, I'd suggest you make both users
> configurable, either by providing a compile time option for "configure"
> or by adding runtime
On 23.01.10 13:51, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> 1. Completely untrusted user for login processes.
> 2. Slightly more trusted internal Dovecot user.
>
> So "dovecot" could be reused for 2. And it would no longer be a mortal
> sin to use dovecot user for owning mail files. For 1. there would be a
> new us
Any thoughts on this:
The primary use for "dovecot" user has been for login processes. But
people keep misunderstanding this and try to use dovecot for accessing
mails. For years I've been wondering about renaming this user to
something else like dovelogin, but it never really seemed practical.
S
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Evaggelos Balaskas
Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2008 1:30 PM
To: Dovecot Mailing List
Subject: Re: [Dovecot] Dovecot User Script?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
just go with the wiki
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
just go with the wiki documentation and everything would be more than
perfect. you should search at Howtoforge for dovecot and google, some of
us have written notes for dovecot setup. But the wiki docs are always
the best source of knowledge around do
I am new to Dovecot. I have been using Postfix as a mail relay to our
Exchange box and have been happy with the setup. The Linux box also
runs Apache and VSFTPD for our WWW and FTP services. However, we are
now starting up a new smaller domain. I am grabbed a spare box and have
setup Fedora 7 o
47 matches
Mail list logo
