On Wednesday 22 of May 2013 15:16:57 Timo Sirainen
wrote:
> Another fix:
http://hg.dovecot.org/dovecot-2.2/rev/33efc5396e44
Now it works as expected. Thanks.
However I discovered a similar issue when renaming a
mailbox (using 33efc5396e44). After the first run of
'doveadm sync' the old mailbo
On Tue, 2013-05-21 at 15:58 +0200, Karol Jurak wrote:
> > Thanks, fixed: http://hg.dovecot.org/dovecot-2.2/rev/9878986a028d
> I performed the test and subscription state of a deleted mailbox is still
> incorrectly synchronized: the mailbox is being subscribed on the first
> server (the one it was
**
On Monday 20 of May 2013 17:33:44 Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On Mon, 2013-05-20 at 15:29 +0200, Karol Jurak wrote:
> > It seems that dsync-2.2.2 doesn't correctly synchronize subscription
> > status of a deleted mailbox.
>
> Thanks, fixed: http://hg.dovecot.org/dovecot-2.2/rev/9878986a028d
On Mon, 2013-05-20 at 15:29 +0200, Karol Jurak wrote:
> It seems that dsync-2.2.2 doesn't correctly synchronize subscription status
> of a deleted mailbox.
Thanks, fixed: http://hg.dovecot.org/dovecot-2.2/rev/9878986a028d
(The fixed dsync protocol is still compatible with the old dsync, but
the
Hi,
It seems that dsync-2.2.2 doesn't correctly synchronize subscription status
of a deleted mailbox. The situation is as follows.
There are two servers: A and B, and a test user test_mdbox. Mailboxes
(mdbox) of
this user on both servers are synchronized. Specifically on both of them
there is
