On Tuesday 19 of November 2013 22:32:15 Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On 19.11.2013, at 16.06, Karol Jurak wrote:
> > It seems that dsync-2.2.7 doesn't correctly synchronize subscription
> > status of a renamed mailbox.
>
> I don’t think any of the v2.2.x dsyncs have done it correctly the first
> time?
On 19.11.2013, at 16.06, Karol Jurak wrote:
> It seems that dsync-2.2.7 doesn't correctly synchronize subscription status
> of a renamed mailbox.
I don’t think any of the v2.2.x dsyncs have done it correctly the first time?
Looks like the fix will be a bit complex. I’ll make v2.2.8 release firs
Hi,
It seems that dsync-2.2.7 doesn't correctly synchronize subscription status
of a renamed mailbox. The situation is as follows.
There are two servers: A and B, and a test user test_mdbox. Mailboxes
(mdbox) of this user on both servers are synchronized. Specifically on both
of them there is a
