On 04/07/2014 12:22 PM, Simon Fraser wrote:
> Thank you. Is it still only the changes that are synced each way, or
> the entire mailbox? I'm trying to gauge the performance hit for enabling
> this on larger mailboxes. (I could, of course, run some tests, but
> someone may already have done that)
C
On Fri, 2014-04-04 at 15:41 +0300, Teemu Huovila wrote:
> Hi
>
> On 04/04/2014 03:38 PM, Simon Fraser wrote:
> > It does help, thank you. Do you also know what the '-f' option does?
> According to the dsync-man page it:
>
> Makes dsync run in "full sync" mode rather than "fast sync" mode. In fas
Hi
On 04/04/2014 03:38 PM, Simon Fraser wrote:
> It does help, thank you. Do you also know what the '-f' option does?
According to the dsync-man page it:
Makes dsync run in "full sync" mode rather than "fast sync" mode. In fast sync
mode dsync might skip syncing a mailbox, if both
locations had
On Fri, 2014-04-04 at 15:34 +0300, Teemu Huovila wrote:
> -d Use a default location for the replica. As far as I can tell this is
> obtained from userdb variable mail_replica.
> -N Sync all (visible?) namespaces (only makes sense when syncing with a
> remote host, with potentially different name
On 04/04/2014 12:42 PM, Nikolaos Milas wrote:
> Anyone please?
>
> How can we determine whether we need to configure
> "replication_dsync_parameters = -d -N -l 30 -U" as indicated on the wiki2 (or
> some variation thereof) or not?
I am definitely not Timo, but I will try a short answer based on
On 4/4/2014 1:17 μμ, Alan McGinlay wrote:
It does appear to be completely undocumented,
We would appreciate if Timo can kindly provide us with -at least- some
details!
I tried looking in the source code but just ended up going in circles
(i'm not familiar with it at all).
I faced the sa
On 2014-04-04 11:42, Nikolaos Milas wrote:
On 31/3/2014 12:03 μμ, Simon Fraser wrote:
On Fri, 2014-03-28 at 11:58 +0200, Nikolaos Milas wrote:
>Question 2a: What do options "-d -N -l 30 -U" signify in
>"replication_dsync_parameters = -d -N -l 30 -U"?
I'd also be interested to know the answer to
On 31/3/2014 12:03 μμ, Simon Fraser wrote:
On Fri, 2014-03-28 at 11:58 +0200, Nikolaos Milas wrote:
>Question 2a: What do options "-d -N -l 30 -U" signify in
>"replication_dsync_parameters = -d -N -l 30 -U"?
I'd also be interested to know the answer to this part. I found mention
of the '-f' o
On Fri, 2014-03-28 at 11:58 +0200, Nikolaos Milas wrote:
> Question 2a: What do options "-d -N -l 30 -U" signify in
> "replication_dsync_parameters = -d -N -l 30 -U"?
I'd also be interested to know the answer to this part. I found mention
of the '-f' option, and adding '-f' to that list appears
On 28/3/2014 10:40 μμ, Nikolaos Milas wrote:
When I started the server (vmail.example.com), mirroring started and
completed fine (after a few hours).
However, since then, I am not seeing a continued mirroring between the
two. I would expect changes to one of the masters to be propagated in
r
On 28/3/2014 11:58 πμ, Nikolaos Milas wrote:
When I started the server (vmail.example.com), mirroring started and
completed fine (after a few hours).
However, since then, I am not seeing a continued mirroring between the
two. I would expect changes to one of the masters to be propagated in
r
I am running two servers with Dovecot v2.2.12 on CentOS x86_64 (5.10 and
6.5 respectively) and users are virtual over ldap.
I have setup our main internal server (vmail.example.com) with dsync
replication according to the first part of
http://wiki2.dovecot.org/Replication. The second one
(vma
12 matches
Mail list logo
