On Mon, 23 Nov 2009 12:01:53 -0500
Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On Mon, 2009-11-23 at 18:01 +0200, Nikita Koshikov wrote:
> > On Fri, 06 Nov 2009 18:42:49 -0500
> > Timo Sirainen wrote:
> >
> > > On Fri, 2009-11-06 at 10:27 +0200, Nikita Koshikov wrote:
> > > > I don't understand why gdb says "no deb
On Mon, 2009-11-23 at 18:01 +0200, Nikita Koshikov wrote:
> On Fri, 06 Nov 2009 18:42:49 -0500
> Timo Sirainen wrote:
>
> > On Fri, 2009-11-06 at 10:27 +0200, Nikita Koshikov wrote:
> > > I don't understand why gdb says "no debugging symbols found" for some
> > > dovecot's executables, all binari
On Fri, 06 Nov 2009 18:42:49 -0500
Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On Fri, 2009-11-06 at 10:27 +0200, Nikita Koshikov wrote:
> > I don't understand why gdb says "no debugging symbols found" for some
> > dovecot's executables, all binaries under /usr/libexec/dovecot have
> > "not stripped"
> ..
> > (gdb) b
On Thu, 05 Nov 2009 12:52:08 -0500
Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On Sat, 2009-10-31 at 10:42 +0200, Nikita Koshikov wrote:
> > The patch helped with quotas, but it raises new error - "segmentation error"
>
> gdb backtrace would be helpful. But how to actually get it could be a
> bit difficult, since I
>
> The patch helped with quotas, but it raises new error - "segmentation
> error"
>
>
After some more tests, I find out that crash happens, while trying to
proceed the third user, and the user's quota and other settings not
important.
On Fri, 30 Oct 2009 13:16:47 -0400
Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On Fri, 2009-10-30 at 14:03 +0200, Nikita Koshikov wrote:
> > > > The problem that some users have their own quotas stored in ldap.
>
> See if the attached patch helps? I'm a bit afraid that it could also
> break something. If it does,
On Fri, 30 Oct 2009 13:16:47 -0400
Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On Fri, 2009-10-30 at 14:03 +0200, Nikita Koshikov wrote:
> > > > The problem that some users have their own quotas stored in ldap.
>
> See if the attached patch helps? I'm a bit afraid that it could also
> break something. If it does,
On Fri, 2009-10-30 at 14:03 +0200, Nikita Koshikov wrote:
> > > The problem that some users have their own quotas stored in ldap.
See if the attached patch helps? I'm a bit afraid that it could also
break something. If it does, there's really no easy way to get this
fixed before v2.0.
diff -r a
On Thu, 29 Oct 2009 13:10:37 -0400
Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On Wed, 2009-10-28 at 10:30 +0200, Nikita Koshikov wrote:
> > The problem that some users have their own quotas stored in ldap.
>
> So the quota_rule should be returned by userdb lookup from ldap, right?
>
One more clean example.
For u
On Thu, 29 Oct 2009 13:10:37 -0400
Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On Wed, 2009-10-28 at 10:30 +0200, Nikita Koshikov wrote:
> > The problem that some users have their own quotas stored in ldap.
>
> So the quota_rule should be returned by userdb lookup from ldap, right?
Yes, and it's working fine with
On Wed, 2009-10-28 at 10:30 +0200, Nikita Koshikov wrote:
> The problem that some users have their own quotas stored in ldap.
So the quota_rule should be returned by userdb lookup from ldap, right?
> Info: auth input: uid=8
> Info: auth input: gid=12
> Info: auth input: home=/data/mail/domain.c
Hello list,
After upgrade to dovecot version 1.2.6 I have noticed some quota
malfunctions(users become often overquota). Looking at logs closely I have
found that quota value resets to general dovecot-config(
quota = maildir:Mailbox quota
quota_rule = *:storage=500M
quota_rule2 = Trash:storage=1
12 matches
Mail list logo
