Charles Marcus writes:
On 2012-08-03 6:33 PM, Voytek Eymont wrote:
don't know, looking this morning it shows like below, the 00:05:05 is
probably last time I did 'ls'? I was doing 'ls' or web mail refresh, to
see what gets removed from 'spam' box, before and after each attempt to
expunge :
Am 06.08.2012 00:47, schrieb Voytek Eymont:
>
> On Mon, August 6, 2012 2:23 am, Charles Marcus wrote:
>
>> The 'date.saved:' is the date/time that the message was moved into that
>> folder.
>>
>> The clock for these messages is based on the time it was moved into that
>> folder, NOT the date/time
On 2012-08-05 6:47 PM, Voytek Eymont wrote:
On Mon, August 6, 2012 2:23 am, Charles Marcus wrote:
The 'date.saved:' is the date/time that the message was moved into that
folder.
The clock for these messages is based on the time it was moved into that
folder, NOT the date/time the message was
On Mon, August 6, 2012 2:23 am, Charles Marcus wrote:
> The 'date.saved:' is the date/time that the message was moved into that
> folder.
>
> The clock for these messages is based on the time it was moved into that
> folder, NOT the date/time the message was received in the message header.
> Mayb
On 2012-08-03 6:33 PM, Voytek Eymont wrote:
don't know, looking this morning it shows like below, the 00:05:05 is
probably last time I did 'ls'? I was doing 'ls' or web mail refresh, to
see what gets removed from 'spam' box, before and after each attempt to
expunge :
date.saved: 2012-08-03 00:0
On Fri, August 3, 2012 11:53 pm, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On 3.8.2012, at 16.47, Voytek Eymont wrote:
>>> Find out what Dovecot thinks the save dates are:
>>> doveadm fetch -u user@domain date.saved mailbox spam
>> date.saved: 2012-08-03 22:44:09
>> date.saved: 2012-08-03 22:44:09
>> date.saved: 20
On 3.8.2012, at 16.47, Voytek Eymont wrote:
>> Find out what Dovecot thinks the save dates are:
>> doveadm fetch -u user@domain date.saved mailbox spam
>
> Timo, thanks
>
> I see...
>
> date.saved: 2012-08-03 22:44:09
> date.saved: 2012-08-03 22:44:09
> date.saved: 2012-08-03 22:44:09
> date.sa
On Fri, August 3, 2012 11:42 pm, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On 3.8.2012, at 16.09, Voytek Eymont wrote:
>
>>> doveadm expunge -A mailbox Junk savedbefore 7d;
>> where am I going wrong ?
>> nothing gets removed:
> Find out what Dovecot thinks the save dates are:
> doveadm fetch -u user@domain date.sav
On 3.8.2012, at 16.09, Voytek Eymont wrote:
>> doveadm expunge -A mailbox Junk savedbefore 7d;
>
> where am I going wrong ?
>
> nothing gets removed:
Find out what Dovecot thinks the save dates are:
doveadm fetch -u user@domain date.saved mailbox spam
I'm pretty sure the problem is simply th
On Fri, August 3, 2012 11:14 pm, Robert Schetterer wrote:
> do you use expire plugin ?
>
> http://wiki2.dovecot.org/Plugins/Expire
no...
I saw this part:
"Note that:
This command runs fine even without expire plugin loaded."
and assumed I didn't have to
OK, back to drawing board, thanks fo
Am 03.08.2012 15:09, schrieb Voytek Eymont:
>
> On Tue, July 10, 2012 9:34 pm, Robert Schetterer wrote:
>
>> perhaps use daily cron with something like this
>>
>> doveadm expunge -A mailbox Junk savedbefore 7d;
>
> where am I going wrong ?
>
> nothing gets removed:
>
> # pwd
> /var/mail/vhost
On Tue, July 10, 2012 9:34 pm, Robert Schetterer wrote:
> perhaps use daily cron with something like this
>
> doveadm expunge -A mailbox Junk savedbefore 7d;
where am I going wrong ?
nothing gets removed:
# pwd
/var/mail/vhosts/sbt.net.au/s...@sbt.net.au/.spam/cur
# ls | wc
532 532
On 07/12/2012 12:29 PM, Wojciech Puchar wrote:
>>> is spam, but provide proper SMTP response.
>>
>> I personally do not recommend rejecting cases (very) close to spam/ham
>> border in SMTP session
> well i have very very low amount of misses
>
> but consider generating meaningful SMTP response like
is spam, but provide proper SMTP response.
I personally do not recommend rejecting cases (very) close to spam/ham
border in SMTP session
well i have very very low amount of misses
but consider generating meaningful SMTP response like "if you are not
spammer call us, so we will fix it"
On 07/10/2012 07:11 PM, Wojciech Puchar wrote:
>>> if I simply delete mail files from the file system, is that a 'bad
>>> thing' ?
>>> [...]
>> IMHO 7 days is dangerously too short. False positives during vacations
>> happen too ;-)
>>
>> I would suggest at least 30 days (as used by Gmail).
>>
> or
if I simply delete mail files from the file system, is that a 'bad thing' ?
[...]
IMHO 7 days is dangerously too short. False positives during vacations
happen too ;-)
I would suggest at least 30 days (as used by Gmail).
or use spam system that NEVER actually receive something it thinks it is
On 07/10/2012 01:25 PM, Voytek Eymont wrote:
> I'm trying to setup per user '+spam' delivery from amavis tags, so that
> each user gets any mails tagged as spam to 'spam' Maildir via +spam
> Dovecot lmtp delivery.
>
> after say 7 days I want to delete all spams older than 7 days,
> if I simply dele
Dovecot lmtp delivery.
after say 7 days I want to delete all spams older than 7 days,
if I simply delete mail files from the file system, is that a 'bad thing' ?
i don't use lmtp so maybe i'm wrong but if you use maildir format just
deleting/moving files always work properly
Am 10.07.2012 13:34, schrieb Robert Schetterer:
> Am 10.07.2012 13:25, schrieb Voytek Eymont:
>> I'm trying to setup per user '+spam' delivery from amavis tags, so that
>> each user gets any mails tagged as spam to 'spam' Maildir via +spam
>> Dovecot lmtp delivery.
>
> i have no amavis, i use a gl
Am 10.07.2012 13:25, schrieb Voytek Eymont:
> I'm trying to setup per user '+spam' delivery from amavis tags, so that
> each user gets any mails tagged as spam to 'spam' Maildir via +spam
> Dovecot lmtp delivery.
i have no amavis, i use a global sieve rule to deliver tagged mail into
special Junk
I'm trying to setup per user '+spam' delivery from amavis tags, so that
each user gets any mails tagged as spam to 'spam' Maildir via +spam
Dovecot lmtp delivery.
after say 7 days I want to delete all spams older than 7 days,
if I simply delete mail files from the file system, is that a 'bad thing
21 matches
Mail list logo
