On 17 September 2012 13:57, Timo Sirainen t...@iki.fi wrote:
On 14.9.2012, at 18.16, Damien Churchill wrote:
On 14 September 2012 15:59, Timo Sirainen t...@iki.fi wrote:
On 14.9.2012, at 17.46, Damien Churchill wrote:
I was wondering what would be entailed in modifying dovecot 2.2 to
Il 15/09/2012 05:39, Jeff Gustafson ha scritto:
On Fri, 2012-09-14 at 17:59 +0300, Timo Sirainen wrote:
I've a whole new design for it and I was planning on implementing it
for v2.2. Do you want to help coding it? :) Which storage would you
want to use?
The generic idea is:
- only one server
Hey dovecot-users,
On 14.09.2012 16:59, Timo Sirainen wrote:
I've a whole new design for it and I was planning on implementing it for
v2.2. Do you want to help coding it? :) Which storage would you want to use?
I'd vote for OpenStack's Swift or Ceph's RADOS. They are both gaining
momentum
On 14.9.2012, at 18.16, Damien Churchill wrote:
On 14 September 2012 15:59, Timo Sirainen t...@iki.fi wrote:
On 14.9.2012, at 17.46, Damien Churchill wrote:
I was wondering what would be entailed in modifying dovecot 2.2 to
support storing mail in an object store. I've seen a few mails
Hi,
I was wondering what would be entailed in modifying dovecot 2.2 to
support storing mail in an object store. I've seen a few mails dotted
around in the ML history about supporting such a thing and seen it's
basically dependant upon some changes in lib-storage to support
writing messages
On 14.9.2012, at 17.46, Damien Churchill wrote:
I was wondering what would be entailed in modifying dovecot 2.2 to
support storing mail in an object store. I've seen a few mails dotted
around in the ML history about supporting such a thing and seen it's
basically dependant upon some changes
On 14 September 2012 15:59, Timo Sirainen t...@iki.fi wrote:
On 14.9.2012, at 17.46, Damien Churchill wrote:
I was wondering what would be entailed in modifying dovecot 2.2 to
support storing mail in an object store. I've seen a few mails dotted
around in the ML history about supporting such
On Fri, 2012-09-14 at 17:59 +0300, Timo Sirainen wrote:
I've a whole new design for it and I was planning on implementing it
for v2.2. Do you want to help coding it? :) Which storage would you
want to use?
The generic idea is:
- only one server accesses one user simultaneously
- index
