On Aug 13, 2008, at 6:19 PM, Diego Liziero wrote:
Mmm.. I tried to comment out the "cork" part and added a 10% random
sleep after sending the command
if (!(rand()%9)) usleep(rand()%500);
and I started getting the famous "Error: IMAP(testdove): FETCH for
mailbox INBOX UID xxx got too little
On Wed, Aug 6, 2008 at 4:26 PM, Timo Sirainen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Aug 6, 2008, at 6:11 AM, Diego Liziero wrote:
>> On Mon, Aug 4, 2008 at 4:17 PM, Timo Sirainen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>
>>> Maybe this helps? http://hg.dovecot.org/dovecot-1.1/rev/8ab845d3c96d
>>>
>>
>> It seems so,
On Aug 6, 2008, at 6:11 AM, Diego Liziero wrote:
On Mon, Aug 4, 2008 at 4:17 PM, Timo Sirainen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Maybe this helps? http://hg.dovecot.org/dovecot-1.1/rev/8ab845d3c96d
It seems so, thanks Timo.
With this patch, by now, all sent mails are correctly written in
"Sent" f
On Mon, Aug 4, 2008 at 4:17 PM, Timo Sirainen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Maybe this helps? http://hg.dovecot.org/dovecot-1.1/rev/8ab845d3c96d
>
It seems so, thanks Timo.
With this patch, by now, all sent mails are correctly written in
"Sent" folder, I'let you know if I've just been lucky :)
On Aug 4, 2008, at 5:21 AM, Diego Liziero wrote:
On Mon, Aug 4, 2008 at 12:07 AM, Timo Sirainen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Aug 3, 2008, at 10:31 PM, Diego Liziero wrote:
It seems so,
I sent you privately the rawlog and the last part of a sent-mail
mailbox.
The interesting thing about t
On Mon, Aug 4, 2008 at 12:07 AM, Timo Sirainen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Aug 3, 2008, at 10:31 PM, Diego Liziero wrote:
>
>> It seems so,
>> I sent you privately the rawlog and the last part of a sent-mail mailbox.
>
> The interesting thing about that rawlog was that it shows the APPEND
> ret
On Aug 3, 2008, at 10:31 PM, Diego Liziero wrote:
It seems so,
I sent you privately the rawlog and the last part of a sent-mail
mailbox.
The interesting thing about that rawlog was that it shows the APPEND
returning it saved the message with UID x, but in the mbox file
there's no UID x,
On Fri, Aug 1, 2008 at 1:09 AM, Timo Sirainen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Aug 1, 2008, at 1:49 AM, Diego Liziero wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jun 23, 2008 at 11:03 AM, Diego Liziero <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> On Tue, May 27, 2008 at 3:48 PM, Diego Liziero <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>
On Aug 1, 2008, at 1:49 AM, Diego Liziero wrote:
On Mon, Jun 23, 2008 at 11:03 AM, Diego Liziero <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
On Tue, May 27, 2008 at 3:48 PM, Diego Liziero <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
On Mon, May 26, 2008 at 11:17 PM, Timo Sirainen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Maybe this helps?
On Mon, Jun 23, 2008 at 11:03 AM, Diego Liziero <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, May 27, 2008 at 3:48 PM, Diego Liziero <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Mon, May 26, 2008 at 11:17 PM, Timo Sirainen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>> Maybe this helps? http://hg.dovecot.org/dovecot-1.1/rev/dd9d344
On Tue, May 27, 2008 at 3:48 PM, Diego Liziero <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, May 26, 2008 at 11:17 PM, Timo Sirainen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> Could it be that the connection died client was trying to save it, so it
>> never got there? Although it still shouldn't have left the From-li
On Tue, May 27, 2008 at 5:43 PM, Timo Sirainen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > Maybe this helps? http://hg.dovecot.org/dovecot-1.1/rev/dd9d344ba140
>>
>> Thanks Timo, I'll let you know if it happens again with this patch.
>
> That only causes the empty message not to be written at all, it doesn't
>
On Tue, 2008-05-27 at 15:48 +0200, Diego Liziero wrote:
> On Mon, May 26, 2008 at 11:17 PM, Timo Sirainen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Could it be that the connection died client was trying to save it, so it
> > never got there? Although it still shouldn't have left the From-line there.
>
>
On Mon, May 26, 2008 at 11:17 PM, Timo Sirainen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Could it be that the connection died client was trying to save it, so it
> never got there? Although it still shouldn't have left the From-line there.
The mailer didn't crashed.
When it happened to me I thought about a
On Mon, 2008-05-26 at 19:11 +0200, Diego Liziero wrote:
> On Mon, May 26, 2008 at 3:34 PM, Timo Sirainen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Mon, 2008-05-26 at 15:08 +0200, Diego Liziero wrote:
> >> I'm talking about mbox Sent folder, where some mailers append through
> >> imap server
> >> a copy of
On Mon, May 26, 2008 at 3:34 PM, Timo Sirainen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, 2008-05-26 at 15:08 +0200, Diego Liziero wrote:
>> I'm talking about mbox Sent folder, where some mailers append through
>> imap server
>> a copy of each message they send.
>>
>> Sometimes, just three header lines g
On Mon, 2008-05-26 at 15:08 +0200, Diego Liziero wrote:
> I'm talking about mbox Sent folder, where some mailers append through
> imap server
> a copy of each message they send.
>
> Sometimes, just three header lines got appended instead of the whole
> mail message, such as:
>
> >From [EMAIL PROT
I'm talking about mbox Sent folder, where some mailers append through
imap server
a copy of each message they send.
Sometimes, just three header lines got appended instead of the whole
mail message, such as:
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri May 23 12:30:14 2008
X-UID: 2852
Status: RO
This happened i
18 matches
Mail list logo
