Great!
Thank you very much, Timo!
Felix
On Sunday 11 August 2013 22:49:43 Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On Fri, 2013-08-09 at 21:12 +0200, Felix Rubio Dalmau wrote:
> > Michael, Charles,
> >
> > thank you for your comments. I had already seen the wikipedia entries
> > about ZFS,
On Fri, 2013-08-09 at 21:12 +0200, Felix Rubio Dalmau wrote:
> Michael, Charles,
>
> thank you for your comments. I had already seen the wikipedia entries
> about ZFS, but when I have performed my tests, consisting in: generate a
> program that writes a 100 MB file to disk and perform the
In order to save space I prefer no to have such half-files (mails) ,
and it is for this reason that I am asking if there is any way to
prevent this.
I'm not an expert in field of file systems, so I can be asking very
naive questions... but I appreciate your comments on this topic.
Filesyst
Michael, Charles,
thank you for your comments. I had already seen the wikipedia entries
about ZFS, but when I have performed my tests, consisting in: generate a
program that writes a 100 MB file to disk and perform the snapshot during the
file is being written. Obviously the snapshot sh
On 09.08.2013, at 19:43, Felix Rubio Dalmau wrote:
> Actually the problem is that the snapshot is instantaneous, so if some
> commands are being run at the time of the snapshot I could get a snapshot of
> a non-consistent FS, right?
As mentioned before: Wrong.
Have a look at http://en.wikipe
On 2013-08-09 1:43 PM, Felix Rubio Dalmau
wrote:
Actually the problem is that the snapshot is instantaneous, so if some commands
are being run at the time of the snapshot I could get a snapshot of a
non-consistent FS, right?
No, that is not right. If it was it would totally defeat the entire
Actually the problem is that the snapshot is instantaneous, so if some commands
are being run at the time of the snapshot I could get a snapshot of a
non-consistent FS, right?
Then, the single solution goes through just shuting down dovecot (and other
services, like apache) the seconds required
On 2013-08-09 8:04 AM, Michael Grimm wrote:
On 2013-08-09 11:44, Felix Rubio Dalmau wrote:
Is there any possibility to ask dovecot to write nothing to disk,
something like a "read only" state, without shutting it down? I have
set up a ZFS+postfix+dovecot mail server, and I need both postfix
(p
On 2013-08-09 11:44, Felix Rubio Dalmau wrote:
Is there any possibility to ask dovecot to write nothing to disk,
something like a "read only" state, without shutting it down? I have
set up a ZFS+postfix+dovecot mail server, and I need both postfix
(postsuper -h ALL) and dovecot (¿?) to stop modi
Felix Rubio Dalmau skrev den 2013-08-09 11:44:
Does anybody has any idea on how to achieve this?
stop dovecot/postfix, maybe remember sql/ldap database aswell
On 2013-08-09 5:44 AM, Felix Rubio Dalmau
wrote:
Is there any possibility to ask dovecot to write nothing to disk, something like a
"read only" state, without shutting it down? I have set up a
ZFS+postfix+dovecot mail server, and I need both postfix (postsuper -h ALL) and dovecot
(¿?) to stop
Hi all,
Is there any possibility to ask dovecot to write nothing to disk,
something like a "read only" state, without shutting it down? I have set up a
ZFS+postfix+dovecot mail server, and I need both postfix (postsuper -h ALL) and
dovecot (¿?) to stop modifying the disk to create the s
12 matches
Mail list logo
