Hi
Am 22.09.2013 03:13, schrieb Reindl Harald:
> Am 22.09.2013 02:20, schrieb Timo Sirainen:
>> %$ is the status, so you're asking for another status variable. Something
>> like in the attached patch, where you can replace %$ with %{login_status}?
>
> *exactly* that's it - many thanks!
>
> %{lo
Am 22.09.2013 02:20, schrieb Timo Sirainen:
> On 22.9.2013, at 1.29, Reindl Harald wrote:
>> login_log_format_elements = %status <%u> %r %m %c %cipher
>> login_log_format = %s
>>
>> Sep 21 18:39:47 localhost dovecot: imap-login: OK, ,
>> 192.168.2.2, CRAM-MD5, DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA
>>
On 22.9.2013, at 1.29, Reindl Harald wrote:
>>> if fact i would only need "login_log_format = %s" but in case of failed
>>> logins
>>> and dictionary attacks with unknown users "%u" is empty - if %u would
>>> *always*
>>> contain the used loginname, wether if it was successful or not i would ha
Am 22.09.2013 00:18, schrieb Reindl Harald:
> Am 22.09.2013 00:07, schrieb Reindl Harald:
>> Am 21.09.2013 23:37, schrieb Timo Sirainen:
>>> Different people want different things logged. I think if I started adding
>>> settings to control those from Dovecot configuration it would quickly
>>> b
Am 22.09.2013 00:07, schrieb Reindl Harald:
> Am 21.09.2013 23:37, schrieb Timo Sirainen:
>> On 14.8.2013, at 17.37, Reindl Harald wrote:
>>
>>> login_log_format_elements = user=<%u> method=%m rip=%r %k
>>>
>>> is it possible to get rid of the "proxy(t...@testserver.rhsoft.net):
>>> started proxy
Am 21.09.2013 23:37, schrieb Timo Sirainen:
> On 14.8.2013, at 17.37, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
>> login_log_format_elements = user=<%u> method=%m rip=%r %k
>>
>> is it possible to get rid of the "proxy(t...@testserver.rhsoft.net): started
>> proxying to 127.0.0.1:143: " part
>> because on a prox
On 14.8.2013, at 17.37, Reindl Harald wrote:
> login_log_format_elements = user=<%u> method=%m rip=%r %k
>
> is it possible to get rid of the "proxy(t...@testserver.rhsoft.net): started
> proxying to 127.0.0.1:143: " part
> because on a proxy-only server i know that and it is explicitly not lis
Am 14.08.2013 17:12, schrieb Reindl Harald:
>> is it possible to get rid of the "proxy(t...@testserver.rhsoft.net): started
>> proxying to 127.0.0.1:143: " part
>> because on a proxy-only server i know that and it is explicitly not listed
>> in "login_log_format_elements"
>>
> got it
>
> login
Am 14.08.2013 16:37, schrieb Reindl Harald:
> Hi
>
> login_log_format_elements = user=<%u> method=%m rip=%r %k
>
> is it possible to get rid of the "proxy(t...@testserver.rhsoft.net): started
> proxying to 127.0.0.1:143: " part
> because on a proxy-only server i know that and it is explicitly
Hi
login_log_format_elements = user=<%u> method=%m rip=%r %k
is it possible to get rid of the "proxy(t...@testserver.rhsoft.net): started
proxying to 127.0.0.1:143: " part
because on a proxy-only server i know that and it is explicitly not listed in
"login_log_format_elements"
as well as for t
10 matches
Mail list logo