Scott Silva wrote, On 2/10/09 11:34 AM:
on 2-9-2009 7:53 PM Linux Advocate spake the following:
B. Am i right in concluding that its easier and better in the long run to
implement and enforce quotas thru dovecot instead of postfix?
If you enforce quota with postfix only, the quota effects mail
on 2-9-2009 7:53 PM Linux Advocate spake the following:
>
>>> B. Am i right in concluding that its easier and better in the long run to
>> implement and enforce quotas thru dovecot instead of postfix?
>>
>> If you enforce quota with postfix only, the quota effects mail deliveries
>> via
>> SMTP
>
> > B. Am i right in concluding that its easier and better in the long run to
> implement and enforce quotas thru dovecot instead of postfix?
>
> If you enforce quota with postfix only, the quota effects mail deliveries via
> SMTP only, but not when IMAP users upload stuff.
>
Steffen, thi
Sahil, my answer below...
--
>
> > i rather not patch postfix and m therefore leaning towards quota via
> > dovecot.
> But after reading some posts ,etc, it seems that the information on the
> dovecot
> wiki is inaccurate.
> >
> > A.Any comments on this?
>
> To which posts are you referr
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, 6 Feb 2009, Linux Advocate wrote:
B. Am i right in concluding that its easier and better in the long run
to implement and enforce quotas thru dovecot instead of postfix?
If you enforce quota with postfix only, the quota effects mail delive
On Fri, 06 Feb 2009, Linux Advocate wrote:
> i rather not patch postfix and m therefore leaning towards quota via dovecot.
> But after reading some posts ,etc, it seems that the information on the
> dovecot wiki is inaccurate.
>
> A.Any comments on this?
To which posts are you referring?
> B.
Guys,
i m new to dovecot. I m setting up a new mailserver and planning to run
dovecot and postfix of a centos 5.2 box.
I have been reading of quota management from various sources and understand
that mail box quota can be implemented either thru postfix ( with vda patch )
or thru dovecot.
i
