Timo,
Any hints on how many POP3 and IMAP connections I'd be able to get
away with in a single threads with the above setup, assuming they're
relative busy? I.e. if my boxes typically have, say, 200 concurrent
POP3 connections and 600 IMAP connections, if I used
process_min_avail=50 for POP3
On 15.11.2010, at 22.58, Mark Moseley wrote:
Timo,
Any hints on how many POP3 and IMAP connections I'd be able to get
away with in a single threads with the above setup, assuming they're
relative busy?
The problem is that if there is any waiting for locks, all the other
connections hang
Timo,
Any hints on how many POP3 and IMAP connections I'd be able to get
away with in a single threads with the above setup, assuming they're
relative busy?
The problem is that if there is any waiting for locks, all the other
connections hang there as well waiting for it. Same for any type
Only potential problem is memory leaks that keep increasing the memory
usage. Of course there should be no memory leaks. :) You could anyway set
something like service_count=1000 to get it to restart after handling 1000
connections.
I'll keep that one in mind. Doesn't seem like it could
This is copy-pasted from Timo's comment in the Todays Performance
Data for 2.0.x thread, but I didn't want to hijack that thread. In
it, Timo says:
snip
service imap {
service_count = 0
}
(i.e. reuse imap processes) reduced the system CPU usage to almost
nothing. But if you use different UIDs
On 9.11.2010, at 22.14, Mark Moseley wrote:
service imap {
service_count = 0
}
Is that safe to do in imap and/or pop3? Or at least no more insecure
than using service_count=0 for imap-login and pop3-login?
Yep.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Le 10.11.2010 00:05, Timo Sirainen a écrit :
On 9.11.2010, at 22.14, Mark Moseley wrote:
service imap {
service_count = 0
}
Is that safe to do in imap and/or pop3? Or at least no more insecure
than using service_count=0 for imap-login and
On Tue, Nov 9, 2010 at 3:05 PM, Timo Sirainen t...@iki.fi wrote:
On 9.11.2010, at 22.14, Mark Moseley wrote:
service imap {
service_count = 0
}
Is that safe to do in imap and/or pop3? Or at least no more insecure
than using service_count=0 for imap-login and pop3-login?
Yep.
Would the
On 9.11.2010, at 23.49, Mark Moseley wrote:
On Tue, Nov 9, 2010 at 3:05 PM, Timo Sirainen t...@iki.fi wrote:
On 9.11.2010, at 22.14, Mark Moseley wrote:
service imap {
service_count = 0
}
Would the risks involved be identical to your warnings about using
service_count=0 with
On Tue, Nov 9, 2010 at 3:55 PM, Timo Sirainen t...@iki.fi wrote:
On 9.11.2010, at 23.49, Mark Moseley wrote:
On Tue, Nov 9, 2010 at 3:05 PM, Timo Sirainen t...@iki.fi wrote:
On 9.11.2010, at 22.14, Mark Moseley wrote:
service imap {
service_count = 0
}
Would the risks involved be
10 matches
Mail list logo
