Re: [Dovecot] status & use-case of fts_solr?

2009-10-10 Thread PGNet Dev
On Sat, Oct 10, 2009 at 1:49 PM, Timo Sirainen wrote: > The lack of IMAP compliance isn't really as serious as you seem to think. that may well be the case ... i'm simply presuming, based on oft-made excuses @ MUA dev that "it's not in the IMAP spec blah blah blah" that it IS a peblem. > Almost

Re: [Dovecot] status & use-case of fts_solr?

2009-10-10 Thread Timo Sirainen
On Oct 10, 2009, at 12:41 AM, PGNet Dev wrote: if, in fact, solr's the better performance solution, i hope that the IMAP compliance might, somehow, get addressed -- either from the Dovecot side, the MUAs, or both. The lack of IMAP compliance isn't really as serious as you seem to think. Almo

Re: [Dovecot] status & use-case of fts_solr?

2009-10-09 Thread PGNet Dev
On Fri, Oct 9, 2009 at 7:21 PM, Patrick Nagel wrote: > Cross-referencing > http://www.dovecot.org/list/dovecot/2009-September/042904.html > > So when you have a huge amount of folders (like we do... there are users > with >1 folders), Solr could have a big advantage through the single > index.

Re: [Dovecot] status & use-case of fts_solr?

2009-10-09 Thread Patrick Nagel
Hi, On Thu, 8 Oct 2009 21:41:36 -0700, PGNet Dev wrote: > hi, > > On Thu, Oct 8, 2009 at 7:56 PM, Timo Sirainen wrote: >> It's just not possible, because it doesn't support substring searches. >> But >> then again, perhaps no one cares. It's not like gmail's search is IMAP >> compliant either. >

Re: [Dovecot] status & use-case of fts_solr?

2009-10-09 Thread Timo Sirainen
On Oct 9, 2009, at 12:41 AM, PGNet Dev wrote: if the goal is fast, indexed FTS of dovecot IMAP stores from within a MUA, is fts_solr even helpful? or is it targeted for web interfaces to search ... ? You can add the break-imap-search option and it'll be helpful with those MUAs that use I

Re: [Dovecot] status & use-case of fts_solr?

2009-10-08 Thread PGNet Dev
hi, On Thu, Oct 8, 2009 at 7:56 PM, Timo Sirainen wrote: > It's just not possible, because it doesn't support substring searches. But > then again, perhaps no one cares. It's not like gmail's search is IMAP > compliant either. > >> if the goal is fast, indexed FTS of dovecot IMAP stores from with

Re: [Dovecot] status & use-case of fts_solr?

2009-10-08 Thread Timo Sirainen
On Oct 8, 2009, at 10:51 PM, PGNet Dev wrote: as of dovecot v1.1.2, squat's required for IMAP compliance; solr search breaks it. is that still the case in v1.2? Is IMAP-compliant Solr search possible? planned? It's just not possible, because it doesn't support substring searches. But then

[Dovecot] status & use-case of fts_solr?

2009-10-08 Thread PGNet Dev
i've deployed a Solr server, and setup Dovecot for *both* squat & solr FTS. iiuc, reading at, http://wiki.dovecot.org/Plugins/FTS http://wiki.dovecot.org/Plugins/FTS/Solr as of dovecot v1.1.2, squat's required for IMAP compliance; solr search breaks it. is that still the case in v1.2? Is IMA