Re: [Dovecot] v2.0.beta3 released

2010-02-22 Thread Timo Sirainen
On Sun, 2010-02-21 at 07:26 +0100, Thomas Leuxner wrote: Am 21.02.2010 um 07:16 schrieb Timo Sirainen: Yes, that's intentional. imaps isn't a protocol. Thanks Timo. Has the specific logging option for the LDA been dropped? I see it logging to 'info_log_path=' only. What specific logging

Re: [Dovecot] v2.0.beta3 released

2010-02-22 Thread Thomas Leuxner
Am 22.02.2010 um 16:29 schrieb Timo Sirainen: What specific logging option for LDA?.. Seems to work exactly the same as in v1.2: protocol lda { info_log_path = /tmp/deliver.log } Ah ok. Thought all logging ought to be configured in 'logging.conf' as there was no example in 'lda.conf'.

Re: [Dovecot] v2.0.beta3 released

2010-02-22 Thread Timo Sirainen
On 22.2.2010, at 19.49, Thomas Leuxner wrote: Am 22.02.2010 um 16:29 schrieb Timo Sirainen: What specific logging option for LDA?.. Seems to work exactly the same as in v1.2: protocol lda { info_log_path = /tmp/deliver.log } Ah ok. Thought all logging ought to be configured in

Re: [Dovecot] v2.0.beta3 released

2010-02-22 Thread Thomas Leuxner
Am 22.02.2010 um 18:53 schrieb Timo Sirainen: Since I switched to lmtp delivery yesterday, would it also be possible to have a different logging path for that? Nope. It would be now much simpler to implement it though. log daemon would just need to support reading/using separate config

Re: [Dovecot] v2.0.beta3 released

2010-02-22 Thread Timo Sirainen
On 22.2.2010, at 19.53, Timo Sirainen wrote: Nope. It would be now much simpler to implement it though. log daemon would just need to support reading/using separate config for each service. Maybe it could even be implemented in less than 50 lines of code.. Oh, actually not. The difficult

Re: [Dovecot] v2.0.beta3 released

2010-02-22 Thread Thomas Leuxner
Am 22.02.2010 um 18:59 schrieb Timo Sirainen: Oh, actually not. The difficult part is that Dovecot just doesn't support logging to multiple files (with same severity) in a same process. The logging code would have to be abstracted out before that would be possible. Actually I like the idea

Re: [Dovecot] v2.0.beta3 released

2010-02-22 Thread Timo Sirainen
On 22.2.2010, at 20.19, Thomas Leuxner wrote: Am 22.02.2010 um 18:59 schrieb Timo Sirainen: Oh, actually not. The difficult part is that Dovecot just doesn't support logging to multiple files (with same severity) in a same process. The logging code would have to be abstracted out before

[Dovecot] v2.0.beta3 released

2010-02-20 Thread Timo Sirainen
http://dovecot.org/releases/2.0/beta/dovecot-2.0.beta3.tar.gz http://dovecot.org/releases/2.0/beta/dovecot-2.0.beta3.tar.gz.sig I had to break a few APIs in this release to get some other stuff implemented and fixed. And since I had to break some of them, I decided it could be a good time to do

Re: [Dovecot] v2.0.beta3 released

2010-02-20 Thread Thomas Leuxner
Hi, this is the first 2.0 build I tested, and I haven't been following the 2.0 threads very closely. This said I'm puzzled whether 'protocols = imap' does what it should. It also enables a listener for IMAPS on port 993, different to what 1.2 series did. I had to manually disable the IMAPS

Re: [Dovecot] v2.0.beta3 released

2010-02-20 Thread Timo Sirainen
On Sat, 2010-02-20 at 23:41 +0100, Thomas Leuxner wrote: this is the first 2.0 build I tested, and I haven't been following the 2.0 threads very closely. This said I'm puzzled whether 'protocols = imap' does what it should. It also enables a listener for IMAPS on port 993, different to

Re: [Dovecot] v2.0.beta3 released

2010-02-20 Thread Thomas Leuxner
Am 21.02.2010 um 07:16 schrieb Timo Sirainen: Yes, that's intentional. imaps isn't a protocol. Thanks Timo. Has the specific logging option for the LDA been dropped? I see it logging to 'info_log_path=' only. Regards Thomas