On Fri, 27 Jan 2012 14:03:11 -0700, The Doctor wrote:
IT might be easier just in configuration to look up
which version of ld you have as if it does not need the --as-needed
flag.
replyed sent privately, keep up the good work on freebsd :=)
On Fri, Jan 27, 2012 at 09:53:02PM +0100, Benny Pedersen wrote:
> On Thu, 26 Jan 2012 14:51:02 -0600, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
>
>> You're trying to run bleeding edge Dovecot, compiling it from source, on
>> an 8 year old platform...
>
> i remember freebsd 4.9 installed from 2 1440kb floppy disks, why
On Thu, 26 Jan 2012 14:51:02 -0600, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
You're trying to run bleeding edge Dovecot, compiling it from source,
on
an 8 year old platform...
i remember freebsd 4.9 installed from 2 1440kb floppy disks, why is
upgradeing so hard to keep without reinstalling ?
gentoo/funtoo it
On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 23:51, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
> On 1/25/2012 6:01 PM, The Doctor wrote:
> > BSD/OS 4.3.1
>
> A defunct/dead operating system, last released in 2003, support
> withdrawn in 2004. BSDI went belly up. Wind River acquired and then
> killed BSD/OS. You're using a dead, 9 year
On 1/25/2012 6:01 PM, The Doctor wrote:
> BSD/OS 4.3.1
A defunct/dead operating system, last released in 2003, support
withdrawn in 2004. BSDI went belly up. Wind River acquired and then
killed BSD/OS. You're using a dead, 9 year old OS, that hasn't seen
official updates for 8 years.
Do you th
On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 01:42:11AM +0200, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On 26.1.2012, at 1.39, The Doctor wrote:
>
> > All right, can you get configure to detect --as-needed flag for ld?
> >
> > This is show stopping for me.
>
> It should only be used with GNU ld. What ld and OS do you use? configure
On 26.1.2012, at 1.39, The Doctor wrote:
> All right, can you get configure to detect --as-needed flag for ld?
>
> This is show stopping for me.
It should only be used with GNU ld. What ld and OS do you use? configure
--without-gnu-ld probably works also?
On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 01:03:58AM +0200, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> http://dovecot.org/releases/2.1/rc/dovecot-2.1.rc5.tar.gz
> http://dovecot.org/releases/2.1/rc/dovecot-2.1.rc5.tar.gz.sig
>
> I'm still lagging behind reading emails. v2.1.0 will be released after I've
> finished that. RC5 is alread
http://dovecot.org/releases/2.1/rc/dovecot-2.1.rc5.tar.gz
http://dovecot.org/releases/2.1/rc/dovecot-2.1.rc5.tar.gz.sig
I'm still lagging behind reading emails. v2.1.0 will be released after I've
finished that. RC5 is already stable and used in production, but I want to make
sure that I haven't
