On 26.02.2013, at 21:23, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On 26.2.2013, at 22.20, Michael Grimm wrote:
>> Actually, while going through all those files and writing this mail, all
>> missing messages appeared in my MUA, and I do find in both maillogs:
>>
>> @mx1:
>> | dovecot: dsync-local(test): Error: d
On 26.2.2013, at 22.20, Michael Grimm wrote:
> BUT: It look as if I haven't waited long enough for replication to become
> finished, sorry :-(
>
> Actually, while going through all those files and writing this mail, all
> missing messages appeared in my MUA, and I do find in both maillogs:
>
On 26.02.2013, at 10:55, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> I can't reproduce this. Some interesting questions:
>
> * If you include hostname+counter in the message, what do the mailboxes look
> like in the different sides? Did they skip over some numbers or did they both
> stop at some specific remote co
On 2013-02-26 10:55, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On 25.2.2013, at 17.38, Michael Grimm
wrote:
Yes. I would expect 400 messages at every inbox, but normally I do
end up with around 270 in an inbox, and both inboxes do show slightly
different numbers (e.g. 245 and 297). (Looks like stopping.)
I can
On 25.2.2013, at 17.38, Michael Grimm wrote:
> On 2013-02-25 15:58, Timo Sirainen wrote:
>> On 21.2.2013, at 22.12, Michael Grimm wrote:
>
>>> Whenever I do run those tests with a delay of 1 second between every
>>> injection, I do observe, that not all mails injected become visible in my
>>>
On 2013-02-25 15:58, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On 21.2.2013, at 22.12, Michael Grimm
wrote:
Whenever I do run those tests with a delay of 1 second between every
injection, I do observe, that not all mails injected become visible in
my MUAs (Mail.app and Roundcube), immediately. All "get new mail"
On 21.2.2013, at 22.12, Michael Grimm wrote:
> Whenever I do run those tests with a delay of 1 second between every
> injection, I do observe, that not all mails injected become visible in my
> MUAs (Mail.app and Roundcube), immediately. All "get new mail" functionality
> or MUA restarts fails
Thank you very much Michael.
I'll set it up again, because I think that initially I was not using any
aggregator service. My setup is a little atypical as I have servers
spread-out on 2 (soon 3) continents that are connected via slow uplinks.
Hopefully the v2.2 is more stable and less buggy for t
Il 21/02/2013 16:34, Timo Sirainen ha scritto:
Please test and report any bugs found!
Hi,
I'm running dovecot 2.2b2 , for the first time, with vpopmail-auth and
works fine.
But I found this bug, also present in 2.1.15. When I enable dict quota
with mysql and in dovecot DB there is no entry
Hi --
On 2013-02-21 Michescu Andrei wrote:
Can you post to the list your working configurations for dovecot?
(This is based on
http://dovecot.org/list/dovecot/2012-March/064513.html)
My design:
single user "vmail" to run dsync over ssh
(one may use root instead)
Thus, m
On 2/21/2013 8:43 AM, Odhiambo Washington wrote:
> I've been running 2.2beta1 in production since it got out and I haven't had
> any issues. However, my setup is simply IMAP/POP3 without any complicated
> configurations. This is on FreeBSD 8.3-STABLE with about 100 users.
> I've just updated to 2.2
Hello Michael,
Can you post to the list your working configurations for dovecot?
I've been fighting with the dsync replication a while ago and was super
buggy so I've put that project on ice.
If now it finally works I would like to get it moving again.
Best,
Andrei
> On 21.02.2013, at 21:17, T
On 21.02.2013, at 21:17, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On 21.2.2013, at 22.12, Michael Grimm wrote:
>> But, if I do restart any one of both dovecot servers involved, those
>> remaining missing messages are fetched instantaneously.
>
> Possibly a bug, see if it still happens with beta2.
Sorry, I did
On 21.2.2013, at 22.12, Michael Grimm wrote:
> I am running v2.2beta1 for almost a week now (handful of users, ~1000
> mails/day). And yes, I can confirm that replication works ...
>
>> Please test and report any bugs found!
>
> ... there is only a "feature request" left:
>
> I did run a lot
On 21.02.2013, at 16:34, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> A ton of fixes since beta1. Especially the new dsync and the replication
> server related to that should really work now.
I am running v2.2beta1 for almost a week now (handful of users, ~1000
mails/day). And yes, I can confirm that replication wo
I've been running 2.2beta1 in production since it got out and I haven't had
any issues. However, my setup is simply IMAP/POP3 without any complicated
configurations. This is on FreeBSD 8.3-STABLE with about 100 users.
I've just updated to 2.2b2...
On 21 February 2013 18:34, Timo Sirainen wrote:
http://dovecot.org/releases/2.2/beta/dovecot-2.2.beta2.tar.gz
http://dovecot.org/releases/2.2/beta/dovecot-2.2.beta2.tar.gz.sig
A ton of fixes since beta1. Especially the new dsync and the replication server
related to that should really work now. It also works correctly now for shared
mailboxes
17 matches
Mail list logo
