On Tuesday, March 3, 2020 9:00 PM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On 3. Mar 2020, at 20.38, Simon Ser cont...@emersion.fr wrote:
>
> > This causes the body structure to be incorrect. The RFC says it's fine o
> > have empty header field values.
>
> The problem isn't empty header field. It's that the
On 3. Mar 2020, at 20.38, Simon Ser wrote:
>
> This causes the body structure to be incorrect. The RFC says it's fine o
> have empty header field values.
The problem isn't empty header field. It's that the mail is missing
Mime-Version header. If that doesn't exist, then the Content-* headers
Hi!
Thanks for the patch, we'll look into it.
Aki
> On 03/03/2020 20:38 Simon Ser wrote:
>
>
> This causes the body structure to be incorrect. The RFC says it's fine o
> have empty header field values.
> ---
>
> This just adds a failing test, inspired from an e-mail spotted in the
> wild.
This causes the body structure to be incorrect. The RFC says it's fine o
have empty header field values.
---
This just adds a failing test, inspired from an e-mail spotted in the
wild. Ideas welcome to fix it.
src/lib-imap/test-imap-bodystructure.c | 13 +
1 file changed, 13
