On Tue Mar 13 2018 08:12:29 GMT-0400 (Eastern Standard Time), Aki Tuomi
wrote:
> On 13.03.2018 14:10, Tanstaafl wrote:
>> Yes... per folder? Or per user?
> Sorry, ment per folder. =)
Heh, no worries, ok, thanks, nothing to worry about so much then.
On 13.03.2018 14:10, Tanstaafl wrote:
> On Tue Mar 13 2018 07:42:31 GMT-0400 (Eastern Standard Time), Aki Tuomi
> wrote:
>>> Is this index file kept on a per *folder* basis? Or per user/account?
>> Yes
> Yes... per folder? Or per user?
Sorry, ment per folder. =)
>>> If it is per folder, then it
On Tue Mar 13 2018 07:42:31 GMT-0400 (Eastern Standard Time), Aki Tuomi
wrote:
>> Is this index file kept on a per *folder* basis? Or per user/account?
> Yes
Yes... per folder? Or per user?
>> If it is per folder, then it is much less of a problem, and could be
>> worked around simply by moving
On 13.03.2018 13:40, Tanstaafl wrote:
> On Sat Feb 24 2018 11:32:05 GMT-0500 (Eastern Daylight Time), Aki Tuomi
> wrote:
>>> On 23 February 2018 at 23:12 Tanstaafl wrote:
>>> Ok, so, I'm still unclear...
>>>
>>> what cache are we talking about? Are you saying that there is a limit to
>>> how ma
On Sat Feb 24 2018 11:32:05 GMT-0500 (Eastern Daylight Time), Aki Tuomi
wrote:
>> On 23 February 2018 at 23:12 Tanstaafl wrote:
>> Ok, so, I'm still unclear...
>>
>> what cache are we talking about? Are you saying that there is a limit to
>> how many emails dovecot can store in a single... 'folde
> On 23 February 2018 at 23:12 Tanstaafl wrote:
>
>
> On Fri Feb 23 2018 14:53:53 GMT-0500 (Eastern Standard Time), Aki Tuomi
> wrote:
> > It is problem for any mailbox
>
> Ok, so, I'm still unclear...
>
> what cache are we talking about? Are you saying that there is a limit to
> how many em
On Fri Feb 23 2018 14:53:53 GMT-0500 (Eastern Standard Time), Aki Tuomi
wrote:
> It is problem for any mailbox
Ok, so, I'm still unclear...
what cache are we talking about? Are you saying that there is a limit to
how many emails dovecot can store in a single... 'folder'?
It is problem for any mailbox
---Aki TuomiDovecot oy
Original message From: Tanstaafl
Date: 23/02/2018 21:36 (GMT+02:00) To: dovecot@dovecot.org Subject: Re:
Assertion during dsync receive
On Fri Feb 23 2018 13:53:27 GMT-0500 (Eastern Standard Time), Aki Tuomi
wrote
On Fri Feb 23 2018 13:53:27 GMT-0500 (Eastern Standard Time), Aki Tuomi
wrote:
> Once you cache grows bigger than 0x400 you have problems
This is for a single mailbox? IS this only a problem for mbox and maybe
sdbox?
Once you cache grows bigger than 0x400 you have problems
---Aki TuomiDovecot oy
Original message From: Ian Bobbitt
Date: 23/02/2018 20:33 (GMT+02:00) To: dovecot@dovecot.org Subject: Re:
Assertion during dsync receive
Thanks. I've had the user clear out
8 11:33 AM, Aki Tuomi wrote:
> The mailbox is too big.
>
>
>
> ---
> Aki Tuomi
> Dovecot oy
>
> Original message
> From: Ian Bobbitt
> Date: 23/02/2018 17:52 (GMT+02:00)
> To: dovecot@dovecot.org
> Subject: Assertion during dsync receive
>
&
The mailbox is too big.
---Aki TuomiDovecot oy
Original message From: Ian Bobbitt
Date: 23/02/2018 17:52 (GMT+02:00) To: dovecot@dovecot.org Subject: Assertion
during dsync receive
Hi,
I'm getting an assertion failed on the receiving side, causing syncs to fail
fo
Hi,
I'm getting an assertion failed on the receiving side, causing syncs to fail
for one user. The servers are setup so that
only one is receiving any traffic other than replication at any time. The one
that's only receiving replications is the
one that's failing.
I've tried deleting the user's
13 matches
Mail list logo
