> On 22/04/2023 18:21 EEST Michael Grimm via dovecot
> wrote:
>
>
> Marc wrote:
>
> >> Blacklistd places a very short set of code to send a small packet to a
> >> socket when
> >> the decision is made to deny access.
>
> > And ho
Marc wrote:
>> Blacklistd places a very short set of code to send a small packet to a
>> socket when
>> the decision is made to deny access.
> And how does blacklistd get fed?
Actually, one needs to add a small amount of code to dovecot which writes to a
so
>
> Since blacklistd uses PF, you can already use fail2ban or sshguard
> <https://www.sshguard.net/> to achieve the same thing you are after.
> Given that blacklistd is just an intermediary like fail2ban, is
> there a real need for dovecot interfacing with
> On Apr 20, 2023, at 02:04, Odhiambo Washington wrote:
>
>
>
> On Thu, Apr 20, 2023 at 9:08 AM Doug Hardie <mailto:bc...@lafn.org>> wrote:
>> Are there any plans to interface to blacklistd?
>>
>> -- Doug
>
> Hi Doug,
>
> Since blackl
Odhiambo Washington skrev den 2023-04-20 11:04:
Since blacklistd uses PF, you can already use fail2ban or sshguard [1]
to achieve the same thing you are after.
Given that blacklistd is just an intermediary like fail2ban, is there
a real need for dovecot interfacing with it?
fail2ban cant see
Doug Hardie skrev den 2023-04-20 08:07:
Are there any plans to interface to blacklistd?
link ?
imho only weakforced is currently supported, more info for your needs
would help find more info
https://github.com/PowerDNS/weakforced
https://github.com/paul-chambers/blacklistd
or other
> On 20/04/2023 12:17 EEST Marc wrote:
>
>
> >
> > Are there any plans to interface to blacklistd?
> >
> > -- Doug
> >
> >
> > Hi Doug,
> >
> > Since blacklistd uses PF, you can already use fail2ban or sshguard
>
> Are there any plans to interface to blacklistd?
>
> -- Doug
>
>
> Hi Doug,
>
> Since blacklistd uses PF, you can already use fail2ban or sshguard
> <https://www.sshguard.net/> to achieve the same thing you are after.
> Given that
On Thu, Apr 20, 2023 at 9:08 AM Doug Hardie wrote:
> Are there any plans to interface to blacklistd?
>
> -- Doug
>
Hi Doug,
Since blacklistd uses PF, you can already use fail2ban or sshguard
<https://www.sshguard.net/> to achieve the same thing you are after.
Given that
Are there any plans to interface to blacklistd?
-- Doug
___
dovecot mailing list -- dovecot@dovecot.org
To unsubscribe send an email to dovecot-le...@dovecot.org
On 4/5/2019 21:02, Aki Tuomi via dovecot wrote:
On 4 May 2019 20:55 Lefteris Tsintjelis via dovecot wrote:
Would be really really REALLY nice to have dovecot interact directly
with blacklistd! Makes a huge difference on busy systems and beats log
parsing by far.
Thank you
Dovecot
> On 4 May 2019 20:55 Lefteris Tsintjelis via dovecot
> wrote:
>
>
> Would be really really REALLY nice to have dovecot interact directly
> with blacklistd! Makes a huge difference on busy systems and beats log
> parsing by far.
>
> Thank you
Dovecot su
Would be really really REALLY nice to have dovecot interact directly
with blacklistd! Makes a huge difference on busy systems and beats log
parsing by far.
Thank you
On 20.09.2018 00:48, Kurt Lidl wrote:
> Greetings all!
>
> I ported the NetBSD blacklistd support into FreeBSD a while ago
> (FreeBSD 11.x timeframe). I also added support to several of the
> system daemons there, so they could all talk to a centralized daemon
> (bl
Greetings all!
I ported the NetBSD blacklistd support into FreeBSD a while ago (FreeBSD
11.x timeframe). I also added support to several of the system daemons
there, so they could all talk to a centralized daemon (blacklistd).
One of the third party apps that I added support to was sendmail
15 matches
Mail list logo
