Re: Delete vs. Expunge in Public Namespace

2018-10-03 Thread Chris
On Wed, 3 Oct 2018 11:04:05 +0300 Timo Sirainen wrote: > If it's sending CLOSE, that explains it. It's not just "some > servers", it's all IMAP servers. There's UNSELECT command to close > without expunging. Thank you! Sorry, didn't know that. It is sending close: ::1.38247-::1.00143: MALP9 CLOS

Re: Delete vs. Expunge in Public Namespace

2018-10-03 Thread Timo Sirainen
On 3 Oct 2018, at 9.03, Chris wrote: > > On Tue, 2 Oct 2018 18:04:21 +0200 > Chris wrote: > >> Is this because the mailbox is >> part of public namespace? > > Or are they expunged because they're duplicates? Is there any check? > Based on Message ID? No.. None of this makes sense. Dovecot does

Delete vs. Expunge in Public Namespace

2018-10-02 Thread Chris
All, my IMAP client [1] marks messages as deleted, but doesn't expunge. Dovecot (2.2.27-3+deb9u2) expunges them. Is this because the mailbox is part of public namespace? ::1.38247-::1.00143: MALP6 STORE 48,49,50,51,52,53,54,55,56,57,58,59,60,61 +FLAGS (\Deleted) ::1.00143-::1.38247: * 48 FE