On 2019-07-05 23:00, Larry Rosenman via dovecot wrote:
What changes did you make to support partial searches?
added the line maxGramSize="15" /> after
to the block of the schema.xml from the wiki.
Then remove your existing index and managed-schema, restart solr and
reindex.
This nearly do
What changes did you make to support partial searches?
On Fri, Jul 5, 2019 at 3:58 PM Christian Kivalo via dovecot <
dovecot@dovecot.org> wrote:
>
>
> On 2019-06-21 09:18, Götz Reinicke via dovecot wrote:
> > Hi Christian,
> >
> >> Am 20.06.2019 um 18:05 schrieb Christian Kivalo via dovecot
> >>
On 2019-06-21 09:18, Götz Reinicke via dovecot wrote:
Hi Christian,
Am 20.06.2019 um 18:05 schrieb Christian Kivalo via dovecot
:
So if dovecot and Solr are good with a host each, I m fine with
managing two VMs.
They do. I'm using such a setup for some years now.
May be you you could gi
Hi Christian,
> Am 20.06.2019 um 18:05 schrieb Christian Kivalo via dovecot
> :
>
>
>
>> So if dovecot and Solr are good with a host each, I m fine with
>> managing two VMs.
> They do. I'm using such a setup for some years now.
May be you you could give me some suggestions on how to proceed a
> Am 21.06.2019 um 00:13 schrieb @lbutlr via dovecot :
>
> On 20 Jun 2019, at 07:45, Götz Reinicke via dovecot
> wrote:
>> Yes, we are on VMs. Of course I could extend the resources for the dovecot
>> VM (more CPU, more RAM) but as mentioned having separate VMs/systems is in
>> some situatio
On 20 Jun 2019, at 07:45, Götz Reinicke via dovecot wrote:
> Yes, we are on VMs. Of course I could extend the resources for the dovecot VM
> (more CPU, more RAM) but as mentioned having separate VMs/systems is in some
> situations the preferred way.
Yep, that totally makes sense. I am Old™ and
> So if dovecot and Solr are good with a host each, I m fine with
>managing two VMs.
They do. I'm using such a setup for some years now.
--
Christian Kivalo
> Am 20.06.2019 um 12:27 schrieb @lbutlr via dovecot :
>
> On 20 Jun 2019, at 04:12, Riccardo Bicelli via dovecot
> wrote:
>> I agree that is a small mail load.
>> But I mean, if you are running virtual machines (like me) it is
>> better to split the roles and leave solr on its own.
>
> Oh,
On 20 Jun 2019, at 04:12, Riccardo Bicelli via dovecot
wrote:
> I agree that is a small mail load.
> But I mean, if you are running virtual machines (like me) it is
> better to split the roles and leave solr on its own.
Oh, right. I thought we were talking about actual hardware separation.
--
I agree that is a small mail load.
But I mean, if you are running virtual machines (like me) it is
better to split the roles and leave solr on its own.
Il giorno gio 20 giu 2019 alle ore 11:51 @lbutlr via dovecot
ha scritto:
>
> On 20 Jun 2019, at 01:21, Riccardo Bicelli via dovecot
> wrote:
>
On 20 Jun 2019, at 01:21, Riccardo Bicelli via dovecot
wrote:
> ha scritto:
>> what would you suggest? What are the pros and cons for having dovecot and
>> Solr on the same or different hots?
>>
>> I have about 800 accounts, some millions of mails and about 2 TB of zipped
>> mails.
>>
>> F
Hi, from a scalability perspective I would put solr on a separate host.
Regards
Il giorno gio 20 giu 2019 alle ore 09:18 Götz Reinicke via dovecot
ha scritto:
>
> Hi.
>
> what would you suggest? What are the pros and cons for having dovecot and
> Solr on the same or different hots?
>
> I have a
Hi.
what would you suggest? What are the pros and cons for having dovecot and Solr
on the same or different hots?
I have about 800 accounts, some millions of mails and about 2 TB of zipped
mails.
From the recent experiences regarding maintenance I’d prefer different hosts
for each.
13 matches
Mail list logo
