On 18 February 2010 16:41, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> It's not about how much work adding that setting is. It's that I don't
> think there should be settings for stuff that (almost) everyone sets
> only one way. Useless extra settings cause bugs and bloat, both to code
> and documentation.
Understood
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, 18 Feb 2010, Charles Marcus wrote:
But in the modern age, just delivering mail until the quota is exceeded
then rejecting seems to be the simplest thing to do, and imo should be
the default...
You change the "quota" from a (hard) limit to
On 2010-02-18 9:57 AM, Steffen Kaiser wrote:
> But I'd like the "deliver a message if user is under quota and the
> message is smaller than quota".
> Or an option "deliver may exceed the quota by X", sort of like the
> quota_rules for Trash, but for the service. Possible not all scenarios
> can twe
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, 18 Feb 2010, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Thu, 2010-02-18 at 15:57 +0100, Steffen Kaiser wrote:
But I'd like the "deliver a message if user is under quota and the message
is smaller than quota".
The current behavior? Is that what you really m
On Thu, 2010-02-18 at 15:57 +0100, Steffen Kaiser wrote:
> But I'd like the "deliver a message if user is under quota and the message
> is smaller than quota".
The current behavior? Is that what you really meant?
> Or an option "deliver may exceed the quota by X", sort of like the
> quota_rule
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, 18 Feb 2010, Sven Eulberg wrote:
Over quota is over quota...
Perhaps it's better to drop a line in the user's inbox e.g. 'mail from
m...@address.com rejected because there was not enough space in your inbox...'
or something else.
So both s
> On Thu, 2010-02-18 at 09:05 -0500, Charles Marcus wrote:
>> Personally I think the best way would be, if the user isn't over quota
>> at the time of a message delivery, deliver that message, *regardless* of
>> whether or not it puts the user over quota.
>
> Wonder if there's anyone who wouldn't
On Thu, 2010-02-18 at 16:29 +0200, Warren Baker wrote:
> I am not sure how much work it would involve but I would prefer to
> have a config option to either disable or enable the behaviour.
It's not about how much work adding that setting is. It's that I don't
think there should be settings for st
On 18 February 2010 16:20, Timo Sirainen wrote:
>
> Wonder if there's anyone who wouldn't want this behavior? One exception
> could be that if mail is larger than the user's entire quota limit, it
> wouldn't be accepted. And this would happen only for deliver/lmtp, not
> imap append (because it wo
On Thu, 2010-02-18 at 09:05 -0500, Charles Marcus wrote:
> Personally I think the best way would be, if the user isn't over quota
> at the time of a message delivery, deliver that message, *regardless* of
> whether or not it puts the user over quota.
Wonder if there's anyone who wouldn't want this
On 2010-02-18 3:51 AM, Steffen Kaiser wrote:
> On Sun, 14 Feb 2010, Joachim Boltz wrote:
>
>> This is a important for me because sometimes users are lazy. They think
>> "oh, still 10% left, no reason to delete mail" while in the meantime
>> large messages are already bounced, while some small ones
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sun, 14 Feb 2010, Joachim Boltz wrote:
This is a important for me because sometimes users are lazy. They think
"oh, still 10% left, no reason to delete mail" while in the meantime
large messages are already bounced, while some small ones arrive i
hi all,
I'd like to make deliver put mail into a nearly full mailbox even when
they become overquota as a result. The same problem came up a few weeks
ago: http://dovecot.org/list/dovecot/2010-January/045695.html
Since no solution was offered may I suggest this topic as an additional
feature for
On January 29, 2010 7:11:59 PM +0200 Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Fri, 2010-01-29 at 12:01 -0500, Frank Cusack wrote:
when i try to run dovecot for SASL support only, with literally just
this configuration:
protocols = none
ssl = no
I suppose you didn't mean to include "ssl=no" above?
yes, sorr
On Fri, 2010-01-29 at 12:01 -0500, Frank Cusack wrote:
> when i try to run dovecot for SASL support only, with literally just
> this configuration:
>
> protocols = none
> ssl = no
I suppose you didn't mean to include "ssl=no" above?
> Error: ssl_cert_file: Can't use /etc/ssl/certs/dovecot.pem: N
when i try to run dovecot for SASL support only, with literally just
this configuration:
protocols = none
ssl = no
auth default {
mechanisms = plain login
passdb passwd-file {
args = /etc/dovecot/passwd
}
socket listen {
client {
path = /var/spool/postfix/private/auth
mode =
Hi list,
using dovecot in a more complex environment nearly always requires use
of ACLs and shared mailboxes/folders. Now, to make life more easy for
the users, we can use 'dovecot-shared' files to eable per-user
\seen-flagging. Is it possible to make this issue configurable in the
dovecot config,
David Warden escreveu:
I was looking for the same thing earlier this month.
I'm not on v1.2.4 but that should have the mail_log_prefix option
which lets you add something to the start of every log line, including
logouts. I use that to put the username and remote IP in every log
line. It has
ite a bit with troubleshooting.
-David Warden
On Sep 18, 2009, at 2:03 PM, Leonardo Rodrigues wrote:
i'd like to make a simple feature request on dovecot
i'm using v1.2.4 (latest one) and IMAP logout message, by default
is:
Sep 18 14:26:27 correio dovecot: IMAP(
i'd like to make a simple feature request on dovecot
i'm using v1.2.4 (latest one) and IMAP logout message, by default is:
Sep 18 14:26:27 correio dovecot: IMAP(u...@domain.com): Disconnected:
Logged out bytes=384/93
the message can be a little customized with
Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Thu, 2009-06-04 at 17:05 -0500, J.P. Trosclair wrote:
Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Thu, 2009-06-04 at 16:52 -0500, J.P. Trosclair wrote:
Any chance of getting compression support via the zlib plugin for
dovecot deliver in future versions?
Sure, if someone implements it. For
On Thu, 2009-06-04 at 17:05 -0500, J.P. Trosclair wrote:
> Timo Sirainen wrote:
> > On Thu, 2009-06-04 at 16:52 -0500, J.P. Trosclair wrote:
> >> Any chance of getting compression support via the zlib plugin for
> >> dovecot deliver in future versions?
> >
> > Sure, if someone implements it. For me
Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Thu, 2009-06-04 at 16:52 -0500, J.P. Trosclair wrote:
Any chance of getting compression support via the zlib plugin for
dovecot deliver in future versions?
Sure, if someone implements it. For me it's a very low priority.
Understood, was also wondering if a patch woul
On Thu, 2009-06-04 at 16:52 -0500, J.P. Trosclair wrote:
> Any chance of getting compression support via the zlib plugin for
> dovecot deliver in future versions?
Sure, if someone implements it. For me it's a very low priority.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Any chance of getting compression support via the zlib plugin for
dovecot deliver in future versions?
Robert Goldsmith skrev:
[...]
> Therefore, can you please make the timeout changeable from the config
> file, even if it defaults to the current 2min timing, so admins
> supporting mobile users can balance battery life with a need to
> prevent killed tcp connections.
I'm amazed how you figured
On Sun, 2009-04-05 at 01:41 +0100, Robert Goldsmith wrote:
> I would like to make a feature request regarding IMAP Idle support.
>
> Currently when a client triggers Idle support, Dovecot then sends 'OK
> Still Here' messages every 2 minutes. This is apparently to p
Hi all,
I would like to make a feature request regarding IMAP Idle support.
Currently when a client triggers Idle support, Dovecot then sends 'OK
Still Here' messages every 2 minutes. This is apparently to prevent
NAT systems killing the tcp connection and disconnecting
Here is a feature I wish Apple might consider implementing:
When Dovecot is compiled for Mac OS X and using Maildir,
have all mail files be written to disk with a dedicated OSType
(equivalent to the .eml extension).
This would make existing QuickLook generators and Spotlight importers
(e.
On Tue, 2008-12-02 at 05:58 +0200, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> I guess it would be possible to create some kind of a virtual POP3
> mailbox where expunging a message simply removes it from that virtual
> mailbox, but not from the primary mailbox that's visible to IMAP. While
> expunging a message in IMA
On Mon, 2008-12-01 at 11:41 +, Bárður Háskor wrote:
> It would be very nice, if I could force users to leave a copy on the
> server when using POP3. This is because users primarily use a web
> interface to access mail (the web interface uses IMAP), but users can
> also download messages u
It would be very nice, if I could force users to leave a copy on the
server when using POP3. This is because users primarily use a web
interface to access mail (the web interface uses IMAP), but users can
also download messages using POP3.
Users who forget to set the "Leave copy on server"
On 10/23/2008 6:12 PM, Robert Schetterer wrote:
> Hi Timo,
> currently superadmins can be configured
> in dovecot i.e in mysql as "superadmins"
> this means the can log in in any mailbox on the server
> this is a very nice feature in real world scenarios
> specially for support people
>
> in postf
://git.altlinux.org/people/seriv/packages/?p=dovecot-sieve.git). Thank
you very much Timo and Stephan!
I have a feature-request for managesieve configure and Makefiles: they depend
on dovecot sources as they are used for build process.
I think it would be very nice to have not just --with-dovecot
Hi Timo,
currently superadmins can be configured
in dovecot i.e in mysql as "superadmins"
this means the can log in in any mailbox on the server
this is a very nice feature in real world scenarios
specially for support people
in postfixadmin i.e there are also defined
domainadmins ( this is for de
On 4/21/2008 1:15 PM, Scott Silva wrote:
So - how hard would it be to make dovecot simply accept the last
defined setting read, instead of refusing to start?
That seems like a major change in function. To some admins it would be
like suddenly having to drive your car from the other side. Maybe
on 4-18-2008 3:43 AM Charles Marcus spake the following:
Hey Timo,
I was wondering how much trouble it would be to again emulate the way
postfix does something - in this case, the way it reads its config file
when starting up.
Current behavior:
Postfix:
If postfix encounters the same settin
On 4/18/2008 7:32 AM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Fri, 2008-04-18 at 06:43 -0400, Charles Marcus wrote:
Postfix:
If postfix encounters the same setting defined more than once, the last
one wins.
This is how Dovecot also works, just tested..
Dovecot:
If dovecot encounters the same setting defi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, Apr 18, 2008 at 06:43:37AM -0400, Charles Marcus wrote:
> Hey Timo,
>
> I was wondering how much trouble it would be to again emulate the way
> postfix does something [...]
[last config item should win]
FWIW I was just bitten by something l
On Fri, 2008-04-18 at 06:43 -0400, Charles Marcus wrote:
> Postfix:
> If postfix encounters the same setting defined more than once, the last
> one wins.
This is how Dovecot also works, just tested..
> Dovecot:
> If dovecot encounters the same setting defined more than once it gives
> an error
Hey Timo,
I was wondering how much trouble it would be to again emulate the way
postfix does something - in this case, the way it reads its config file
when starting up.
Current behavior:
Postfix:
If postfix encounters the same setting defined more than once, the last
one wins.
Dovecot:
I
On Fri, 2008-03-28 at 11:40 +0100, Ruud Boon wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I hope I'm using the right mailing for a feature request. I'm using
> dovecot on my server for a year now and I'm very happy
> with it. Its extremely stable and fast.
> Ok what is my situation why I&#x
On Mon, 2008-04-07 at 12:20 -0400, Dave McGuire wrote:
> Hey folks. One feature I'd really like to see in dovecot is the
> ability to point it at a database (with a configurable query) and
> have it allow or deny a connection based on looking up the source IP
> address in that database.
pas
Written by Bill Cole on Apr 7, 2008, at 4:58 PM:
Hey folks. One feature I'd really like to see in dovecot is the
ability to point it at a database (with a configurable query) and
have it allow or deny a connection based on looking up the source
IP address in that database.
... much stuff
On Apr 7, 2008, at 4:58 PM, Bill Cole wrote:
Hey folks. One feature I'd really like to see in dovecot is the
ability to point it at a database (with a configurable query) and
have it allow or deny a connection based on looking up the source
IP address in that database.
I run Postfix,
On Apr 7, 2008, at 5:02 PM, Charles Marcus wrote:
Hey folks. One feature I'd really like to see in dovecot is the
ability to point it at a database (with a configurable query) and
have it allow or deny a connection based on looking up the source
IP address in that database.
Is there any rea
On 4/7/2008, Bill Cole ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Hey folks. One feature I'd really like to see in dovecot is the
ability to point it at a database (with a configurable query) and
have it allow or deny a connection based on looking up the source
IP address in that database.
Is there any reaso
At 12:20 PM -0400 4/7/08, Dave McGuire wrote:
Hey folks. One feature I'd really like to see in dovecot is the
ability to point it at a database (with a configurable query) and
have it allow or deny a connection based on looking up the source IP
address in that database.
I run Postfix, an
Hey folks. One feature I'd really like to see in dovecot is the
ability to point it at a database (with a configurable query) and
have it allow or deny a connection based on looking up the source IP
address in that database.
I run Postfix, and I've got it configured to use a database
> Users are retrieving mail using pop3 over the external ip address.
> When the user connects to there webmail. The webmail client
> (Squirrelmail) is using imap on the localhost.
> I would like to give some users the option to use imap over the external
> ip, I want to set option in my MySql ba
Hi!
I hope I'm using the right mailing for a feature request. I'm using
dovecot on my server for a year now and I'm very happy
with it. Its extremely stable and fast.
Ok what is my situation why I'm asking a feature..
Users are retrieving mail using pop3 over the external
It would be nice to be able to do 'dovecot -d' that outputs only/all of
the 'default' values of the currently running version, regardless of
what is explicitly set.
Postfix currently has this option, and it is very useful for one
thing... to compare settings that have been explicitly set to wh
On Wed, 2007-11-28 at 11:18 +0100, Netskin | Corin Langosch wrote:
> Now I have to use a cifs mounted maildir directory and found it to be
> quite slow,
> though I already tuned it a lot. The only way to get it fast was to put
> INDEX and
> CONTROL files on the local disc and so outside of the ma
Hi!
I'm using dovecot for a while now and really like it. Actually dovecot
1.5 on
Debian AMD64.
Now I have to use a cifs mounted maildir directory and found it to be
quite slow,
though I already tuned it a lot. The only way to get it fast was to put
INDEX and
CONTROL files on the local disc
On Sun, 2007-09-09 at 13:26 +0100, Ed W wrote:
> Any suggestions on how this could be done more dynamically, or else
> could I raise a feature request that the auth process somehow realises
> when it's being forwarded to an IP address that it's actually listening
> on alre
Hi, Quick feature request for the proxy function:
I have a couple of machines which are all customer facing and customer
mailbox lives on any one of them. Customer can login to any machine and
the proxy feature then forwards them to the correct machine (often the
machine they are already
On Thu, 2007-04-19 at 08:07 -0700, Daniel L. Miller wrote:
> 1. Have a dedicated "content-filter" functionality built-in to
> Dovecot. Under this model, Dovecot.conf would include at least three
> new parameters: FILTER-FOLDER-SUFFIX, FILTER-FOLDER-IN-SCRIPT, and
> FILTER-FOLDER-OUT-SCRIPT. W
Daniel L. Miller wrote:
I have some thoughts on an interface that would eliminate the need for
compile-time plug-ins, but provide some major power to sysadmins.
Basically, I want a way of telling an external program the following:
1. A message was moved.
2. The folder is moved from was XXX.
Since your "1.1 plans" announcement somehow turned into everybody
handing in a wish list . . . thought I'd start one by itself - since I
expect a few people to have opinions on this matter.
I'm aware of a plug-in functionality in Dovecot, and that a plug-in
exists for dspam processing - but my
201 - 259 of 259 matches
Mail list logo
