Re: Generalized looping possible in pigeonhole sieve?

2016-11-18 Thread Darac Marjal
On Thu, Nov 17, 2016 at 02:42:31PM -0800, Jeff Kletsky wrote: I'm struggling to achieve the kind of filtering with sieve that I was able to do with procmail. A couple of options that I can think of: If the address is sufficiently like the folder name, you can use sieve's regex capabilities.

Re: Generalized looping possible in pigeonhole sieve?

2016-11-17 Thread Larry Rosenman
Sieve EXPLICITLY does NOT have a looping construct. On Thu, Nov 17, 2016 at 4:42 PM, Jeff Kletsky wrote: > I'm struggling to achieve the kind of filtering with sieve that I was able > to do with procmail. > > TL;DR > > I'd like a way to loop through a set of (address,

Generalized looping possible in pigeonhole sieve?

2016-11-17 Thread Jeff Kletsky
I'm struggling to achieve the kind of filtering with sieve that I was able to do with procmail. TL;DR I'd like a way to loop through a set of (address, destination) pairs in sieve so that I can maintain the (address, destination) pairs in one place and not have to explicitly write scores of