Re: Is the Doveadm HTTP API considered stable for production use?

2018-08-23 Thread James Beck
Thanks all for the responses! It sounds safe to use so I'll give it a go :) The reason for using the API is that I'm managing replication pairs behind director, on their own private LAN, and I want to be able to have a single place I can connect in to to query them. I'm hoping this idea will

Re: Is the Doveadm HTTP API considered stable for production use?

2018-08-23 Thread Felipe Gasper
> On Aug 23, 2018, at 8:44 AM, Reio Remma wrote: > > On 23.08.18 15:35, Felipe Gasper wrote: >> >>> On Aug 23, 2018, at 8:14 AM, James Beck wrote: >>> On Wed, Aug 22, 2018 at 09:54:44AM -0400, Felipe Gasper wrote: If you don’t want to use the HTTP API, you can use the raw doveadm

Re: Is the Doveadm HTTP API considered stable for production use?

2018-08-23 Thread Sami Ketola
> On 22 Aug 2018, at 18.55, James Beck wrote: > > Hi, > > I'm running 2.2.34 in production (installed from Debian stretch > backports) and want to rework some scripts. Can the HTTP API be > considered stable in 2.2.34 please? The wiki says it is "considered > experimental in v2.2.22" so I

Re: Is the Doveadm HTTP API considered stable for production use?

2018-08-23 Thread Tom Sommer
On 2018-08-22 11:55, James Beck wrote: Hi, I'm running 2.2.34 in production (installed from Debian stretch backports) and want to rework some scripts. Can the HTTP API be considered stable in 2.2.34 please? I use it in 2.3 and it works just fine :) I might have used it in 2.2 as well, I'm

Re: Is the Doveadm HTTP API considered stable for production use?

2018-08-23 Thread Reio Remma
On 23.08.18 15:35, Felipe Gasper wrote: On Aug 23, 2018, at 8:14 AM, James Beck wrote: On Wed, Aug 22, 2018 at 09:54:44AM -0400, Felipe Gasper wrote: If you don’t want to use the HTTP API, you can use the raw doveadm protocol. https://wiki.dovecot.org/Design/DoveadmProtocol -FG Thanks, I

Re: Is the Doveadm HTTP API considered stable for production use?

2018-08-23 Thread Felipe Gasper
> On Aug 23, 2018, at 8:14 AM, James Beck wrote: > >> On Wed, Aug 22, 2018 at 09:54:44AM -0400, Felipe Gasper wrote: >> If you don’t want to use the HTTP API, you can use the raw doveadm protocol. >> >> https://wiki.dovecot.org/Design/DoveadmProtocol >> >> -FG > > Thanks, I didn't know

Re: Is the Doveadm HTTP API considered stable for production use?

2018-08-23 Thread James Beck
On Wed, Aug 22, 2018 at 09:54:44AM -0400, Felipe Gasper wrote: > If you don’t want to use the HTTP API, you can use the raw doveadm protocol. > > https://wiki.dovecot.org/Design/DoveadmProtocol > > -FG Thanks, I didn't know about that. I suppose testing the HTTP API and then switching to the

Re: Is the Doveadm HTTP API considered stable for production use?

2018-08-22 Thread Felipe Gasper
If you don’t want to use the HTTP API, you can use the raw doveadm protocol. https://wiki.dovecot.org/Design/DoveadmProtocol -FG > On Aug 22, 2018, at 5:55 AM, James Beck wrote: > > Hi, > > I'm running 2.2.34 in production (installed from Debian stretch > backports) and want to rework some

Is the Doveadm HTTP API considered stable for production use?

2018-08-22 Thread James Beck
Hi, I'm running 2.2.34 in production (installed from Debian stretch backports) and want to rework some scripts. Can the HTTP API be considered stable in 2.2.34 please? The wiki says it is "considered experimental in v2.2.22" so I thought I'd check before writing API calls rather than a wrapper