Hi,
Any news for jmap Support in Dovecot?
Thanks,
Mike
erhaps just not as
>> > close as I initially thought.
>
> Obviously I'd love to help out in any way possible here! We're very
> keen to see JMAP support in Dovecot to encourage others to move
> towards it as well.
>
>> Thanks Aki - no pressing need because
I'd love to help out in any way possible here! We're very keen to see
JMAP support in Dovecot to encourage others to move towards it as well.
> Thanks Aki - no pressing need because of the old chicken/egg problem I
> guess...
>
> That said, a few tidbits...
>
> The Thu
On 22 May 2019, at 07:42, Tanstaafl via dovecot wrote:
> Thanks Aki - no pressing need because of the old chicken/egg problem I
> guess...
I have to say, looking at JAMP it looks very interesting. I'd love to throw a
JAMP webmail implementation up and play with it.
--
"I can't marry her; she's
On Wed May 22 2019 05:44:59 GMT-0400 (Eastern Standard Time), Aki Tuomi
via dovecot wrote:
> Unfortunately we have not been able to work on this much, but also the
> JMAP spec was until very recently still being worked. We have open
> dialogue with the Thunderbird people, they haven't so far indic
Unfortunately we have not been able to work on this much, but also the
JMAP spec was until very recently still being worked. We have open
dialogue with the Thunderbird people, they haven't so far indicated any
pressing need for JMAP in Dovecot.
This said, JMAP is still very much in our roadmap. Pe
Hello Aki,
Well, it has been over 3 years since I last asked...
You had said initial JMAP support would hopefully make it into 2.3.
Since it didn't, I'm hoiping it isn't too far away.
There is some movement with the new Thunderbird team on this, but they
can't really start serious work on adding
answer is not yet. we are going to implement it when we get free resources to
do it.
---Aki TuomiDovecot oy
Original message From: Steinar Bang Date:
21/09/2017 17:28 (GMT+02:00) To: dovecot@dovecot.org Subject: Re: JMAP
support in Dovecot
>>>>> Aki Tu
>>>>> Aki Tuomi :
> We are working on including JMAP support to Dovecot. At this moment I
> cannot give any promise for exact version, but hopefully it will be
> part of v2.3
Any updates on jmap support in dovecot?
I tried searching the git repo for "jmap" yes
Hi Charles,
We are actually pretty close to a complete implementation in Cyrus now, and
there's the proxy of course. We'll be doing a release candidate of Cyrus 3.0
with JMAP support on January 13th.
There's also the hosted copy of the JMAP proxy, which I'm afraid I haven't been
giving much l
Dear Charles
In order to gain more info on JMAP implementations and progress being made on
server-side implementations, I'd say the JMAP Google groups would contain the
most information with all discussions.
Currently the most current implementation is the JMAP proxy, which connects to
an IMA
Unfortunately we don't have any beta version yet for testing. Hopefully
sometime next year.
Aki
On 13.12.2016 17:33, Tanstaafl wrote:
> Hi Aki,
>
> Someone just asked in the bug for Thunderbird for this, so...
>
> Is there a git branch that they could use to start playing with what is
> there? I
Hi Aki,
Someone just asked in the bug for Thunderbird for this, so...
Is there a git branch that they could use to start playing with what is
there? If not, any idea when that might happen?
It sounds like someone following the Thunderbird bug is interested in
working on this, but they obviously
Bron Gondwana wrote on 11/27/2016 02:25 PM:
The demo proxy was a pretty quick hack and isn't very efficient, but
it should be working. It does a fairly slow background import for
existing accounts, so I'd recommend using small tests accounts. What
particular bit is broken for you? (apart from t
On Sun, 27 Nov 2016, at 06:07, WJCarpenter wrote:
> I don't know the answer to that question, but I am curious about
> something. What client are you thinking about using with JMAP? I haven't
> found much. (And much of the demo stuff at jmap.io seems to be busted in
> various ways.)
The demo
Hi!
We are working on including JMAP support to Dovecot. At this moment I cannot
give any promise for exact version, but hopefully it will be part of v2.3
Aki Tuomi
Dovecot Oy
> On November 26, 2016 at 11:17 PM Andrew Jones wrote:
>
>
> Hi Marcus
>
> Thanks for your helpful reply.
>
> Do
I am happy with IMAPS. Most of JMAP can be implemented as IMAPS incremental
revisions.
Hi Marcus
Thanks for your helpful reply.
Do you know what is going on with JMAP development into Dovecot 2.5?
It's difficult to get any sort of information from the roadmap and there are no
Dovecot forums.
One of the main reasons I'm interested in JMAP is because of Roundcube Next and
also th
On 2016-11-26 11:07:00 -0800, WJCarpenter wrote:
> I don't know the answer to that question, but I am curious about something.
> What client are you thinking about using with JMAP? I haven't found much.
> (And much of the demo stuff at jmap.io seems to be busted in various ways.)
roundcube-next bu
I don't know the answer to that question, but I am curious about
something. What client are you thinking about using with JMAP? I haven't
found much. (And much of the demo stuff at jmap.io seems to be busted in
various ways.)
Andrew Jones wrote on 11/26/2016 10:43 AM:
Hi there,
I understand
Hi there,
I understand there were discussions to try and develop JMAP support for Dovecot.
Is this still in the pipeline for Dovecot 2.5?
Regards
Andrew
Sent from my iPhone
21 matches
Mail list logo
