-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, 21 Apr 2017, Mihai Badici wrote:
On Friday 21 April 2017 08:36:47 Steffen Kaiser wrote:
On Tue, 18 Apr 2017, Dave Dodd wrote:
I am trying to determine the correct LDAP schema I need to use to have
either mailLocation or mailboxPath
On Friday 21 April 2017 08:36:47 Steffen Kaiser wrote:
> On Tue, 18 Apr 2017, Dave Dodd wrote:
> > I am trying to determine the correct LDAP schema I need to use to have
> > either mailLocation or mailboxPath available ?
> >
> > Should I be just adding this to one of
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, 18 Apr 2017, Dave Dodd wrote:
I am trying to determine the correct LDAP schema I need to use to have either
mailLocation or mailboxPath available ?
Should I be just adding this to one of my own custom objectClasses ?
Surprisingly, lots
Hi,
On Tue, 2017-04-18 at 17:06 +1000, Dave Dodd wrote:
> I am trying to determine the correct LDAP schema I need to use to
> have either
> mailLocation or mailboxPath available ?
I have a custom schema for postfix and dovecot. I then have the various
configuration files set up to matc
On Tuesday 18 April 2017 17:06:30 Dave Dodd wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am trying to determine the correct LDAP schema I need to use to have
> either mailLocation or mailboxPath available ?
>
> Should I be just adding this to one of my own custom objectClasses ?
>
> -- Dave
Actua
Hi,
I am trying to determine the correct LDAP schema I need to use to have either
mailLocation or mailboxPath available ?
Should I be just adding this to one of my own custom objectClasses ?
-- Dave
Hello,
I want to deploy dovecot proxy/director with the backend and
authorization in LDAP. Dovecot wiki specifies only what is necessary
to apply additional arguments that the scheme would have earned a
proxy, but no solid LDAP schema.
Is there such a scheme, such as the existing scheme
http
Hi Hadmut,
Monday, July 30, 2007, 11:27:37 AM, you wrote:
> Hi Sergey,
> Sergey A. Kobzar wrote:
>>
>> You can use standard LDAP attributes. It's more than enough.
> Well, I know that it works with standard LDAP attributes, that's what I
> do right now. But that is what I want to avoid, becau
Hi Sergey,
Sergey A. Kobzar wrote:
>
> You can use standard LDAP attributes. It's more than enough.
Well, I know that it works with standard LDAP attributes, that's what I
do right now. But that is what I want to avoid, because I want to have
IMAP users *without* standard uid/gid attributes bec
2007, 12:53:09 PM, you wrote:
> Hi,
> does dovecot define its own LDAP schema or should I create my own one?
> (I want to provide IMAP boxes for virtual users that do not have a
> Unix account on the mail server and thus do not want to use the
> plain uid/gid entries of the posix
Hi,
does dovecot define its own LDAP schema or should I create my own one?
(I want to provide IMAP boxes for virtual users that do not have a
Unix account on the mail server and thus do not want to use the
plain uid/gid entries of the posix account objectclass to avoid confusion
and
11 matches
Mail list logo