Re: LDAP schema ?

2017-04-21 Thread Steffen Kaiser
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Fri, 21 Apr 2017, Mihai Badici wrote: On Friday 21 April 2017 08:36:47 Steffen Kaiser wrote: On Tue, 18 Apr 2017, Dave Dodd wrote: I am trying to determine the correct LDAP schema I need to use to have either mailLocation or mailboxPath

Re: LDAP schema ?

2017-04-21 Thread Mihai Badici
On Friday 21 April 2017 08:36:47 Steffen Kaiser wrote: > On Tue, 18 Apr 2017, Dave Dodd wrote: > > I am trying to determine the correct LDAP schema I need to use to have > > either mailLocation or mailboxPath available ? > > > > Should I be just adding this to one of

Re: LDAP schema ?

2017-04-20 Thread Steffen Kaiser
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Tue, 18 Apr 2017, Dave Dodd wrote: I am trying to determine the correct LDAP schema I need to use to have either mailLocation or mailboxPath available ? Should I be just adding this to one of my own custom objectClasses ? Surprisingly, lots

Re: LDAP schema ?

2017-04-20 Thread Nikolai Lusan
Hi, On Tue, 2017-04-18 at 17:06 +1000, Dave Dodd wrote: > I am trying to determine the correct LDAP schema I need to use to > have either > mailLocation or mailboxPath available ? I have a custom schema for postfix and dovecot. I then have the various configuration files set up to matc

Re: LDAP schema ?

2017-04-20 Thread Mihai Badici
On Tuesday 18 April 2017 17:06:30 Dave Dodd wrote: > Hi, > > I am trying to determine the correct LDAP schema I need to use to have > either mailLocation or mailboxPath available ? > > Should I be just adding this to one of my own custom objectClasses ? > > -- Dave Actua

LDAP schema ?

2017-04-20 Thread Dave Dodd
Hi, I am trying to determine the correct LDAP schema I need to use to have either mailLocation or mailboxPath available ? Should I be just adding this to one of my own custom objectClasses ? -- Dave

LDAP schema for dovecot proxy?

2015-11-10 Thread Andrey Fesenko
Hello, I want to deploy dovecot proxy/director with the backend and authorization in LDAP. Dovecot wiki specifies only what is necessary to apply additional arguments that the scheme would have earned a proxy, but no solid LDAP schema. Is there such a scheme, such as the existing scheme http

Re: [Dovecot] Dovecot LDAP schema?

2007-07-30 Thread Sergey A. Kobzar
Hi Hadmut, Monday, July 30, 2007, 11:27:37 AM, you wrote: > Hi Sergey, > Sergey A. Kobzar wrote: >> >> You can use standard LDAP attributes. It's more than enough. > Well, I know that it works with standard LDAP attributes, that's what I > do right now. But that is what I want to avoid, becau

Re: [Dovecot] Dovecot LDAP schema?

2007-07-30 Thread Hadmut Danisch
Hi Sergey, Sergey A. Kobzar wrote: > > You can use standard LDAP attributes. It's more than enough. Well, I know that it works with standard LDAP attributes, that's what I do right now. But that is what I want to avoid, because I want to have IMAP users *without* standard uid/gid attributes bec

Re: [Dovecot] Dovecot LDAP schema?

2007-07-28 Thread Sergey A. Kobzar
2007, 12:53:09 PM, you wrote: > Hi, > does dovecot define its own LDAP schema or should I create my own one? > (I want to provide IMAP boxes for virtual users that do not have a > Unix account on the mail server and thus do not want to use the > plain uid/gid entries of the posix

[Dovecot] Dovecot LDAP schema?

2007-07-28 Thread Hadmut Danisch
Hi, does dovecot define its own LDAP schema or should I create my own one? (I want to provide IMAP boxes for virtual users that do not have a Unix account on the mail server and thus do not want to use the plain uid/gid entries of the posix account objectclass to avoid confusion and