Yes, it gets created automatically.
---Aki TuomiDovecot oy
Original message From: J Doe Date:
24/07/2018 00:10 (GMT+02:00) To: dovecot@dovecot.org Subject: Namespace
question
Hi,
I have a question about the “inbox” namespace, as mentioned in:
conf.d/10-mail.conf.
I have
Hi,
I have a question about the “inbox” namespace, as mentioned in:
conf.d/10-mail.conf.
I have written my dovecot.conf file from scratch and do not include:
conf.d/10-mail.conf. I have not defined the “inbox” namespace and so I am
assuming that one is created by default.
When I list the
On 13.4.2012, at 23.41, René Neumann wrote:
I've got two questions regarding imapc and namespaces:
1) Is there a way of stating, that I only want part of the hierarchy on
the end of an imapc connection to be available here? My problem:
hg has now imapc_list_prefix.
2) Private namespaces
Hi,
I've got two questions regarding imapc and namespaces:
1) Is there a way of stating, that I only want part of the hierarchy on
the end of an imapc connection to be available here? My problem:
On the other end the layout is:
INBOX.Shared.{some,nice,folders}
If I mirror this into my dovecot
Hi,
I'm wondering if it is possible to create a virtual namespace on a
prefix other than virtual/. My goal is to mix IMAP folders with
virtual folders on the same folder level (prefix = ).
mail_location = maildir:/data/mail/%d/%u/
# Virtual
namespace private {
prefix =
separator = /
Timo Sirainen wrote:
But I don't think there are any problems if you make INBOX. namespace
the hidden one. Most clients don't care about namespaces.
Hi Timo, thanks for the reply - I understand what you're saying. Can you
theorize what will happen to the already configured/subscribed users
(apologies if this has been covered, can't find it on the Wiki/FAQ, etc.)
We have a stellar, fantastic, hard working Dovecot 1.0.5 (yes, I need to
upgrade) installation running in Courier-IMAP compatibility mode:
mail_location = maildir:~/Maildir:INDEX=/var/spool/dovecot/indexes/%1u/%u
On 5/23/2008, Troy Engel ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Can I add a second hidden namespace with no prefix:
Certainly...
http://wiki.dovecot.org/Namespaces
--
Best regards,
Charles
Charles Marcus wrote:
On 5/23/2008, Troy Engel ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Can I add a second hidden namespace with no prefix:
Certainly...
http://wiki.dovecot.org/Namespaces
See, the wiki page has it backwards though of the way I need to do it;
the empty prefix namespace is the inbox =
On 5/23/2008, Troy Engel ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Can I add a second hidden namespace with no prefix:
Certainly...
http://wiki.dovecot.org/Namespaces
See, the wiki page has it backwards though of the way I need to do it; the
empty prefix namespace is the inbox = yes, not the hidden =
Charles Marcus wrote:
No, but there's no reason it wouldn't... a namespace is a namespace.
Easiest is to just try it...
...I think you missed the whole part of my original email that stated
this is a live, hard working server and just trying things is not an
option. I'm normally a
On 5/23/2008, Troy Engel ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
...I think you missed the whole part of my original email that stated
this is a live, hard working server and just trying things is not
an option. I'm normally a just-push-the-button type of guy, but in
this case I need to get quantified
On Sat, 2007-10-20 at 17:08 -0700, Jeff Grossman wrote:
2 search since 6-Sep-2007
* SEARCH
2 OK Search completed.
3 fetch 1:* internaldate
* 1 FETCH (INTERNALDATE 23-Sep-2007 17:21:04 -0700)
..
Weird. Try the attached patch. What does it log?
diff -r 9e7bf6becfb4
Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Fri, 2007-10-05 at 17:27 -0700, Jeff Grossman wrote:
Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Tue, 2007-10-02 at 18:12 -0700, Jeff Grossman wrote:
So, what would
have changed between version 1.0.5 and 1.1beta2 to somehow make the
phone think all of the messages are older than 30
Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Tue, 2007-10-02 at 18:12 -0700, Jeff Grossman wrote:
So, what would
have changed between version 1.0.5 and 1.1beta2 to somehow make the
phone think all of the messages are older than 30 days?
Is it using SORT command? Apparently there are some bugs still in
On Fri, 2007-10-05 at 17:27 -0700, Jeff Grossman wrote:
Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Tue, 2007-10-02 at 18:12 -0700, Jeff Grossman wrote:
So, what would
have changed between version 1.0.5 and 1.1beta2 to somehow make the
phone think all of the messages are older than 30 days?
Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Fri, 2007-10-05 at 17:27 -0700, Jeff Grossman wrote:
Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Tue, 2007-10-02 at 18:12 -0700, Jeff Grossman wrote:
So, what would
have changed between version 1.0.5 and 1.1beta2 to somehow make the
phone think all of the messages are
Okay, I feel pretty stupid now. It was not a problem with namespaces
at all. But, I think there is a problem somewhere. I had the phone
setup to display the last 30 days of messages. When I would sync it
up, it did not display any messages. That is why I thought something
was messed up
I installed 1.1Beta2 over 1.0.5 last night. My 1.0.5 setup was running
with no problems at all. Stupid me overwrote my dovecot.conf file with a
vanilla one. I know I know, backup!!! I am pretty sure my old
dovecot.conf file did not specify any namespaces, but I could be mistaken.
My
Jeff Grossman wrote:
I installed 1.1Beta2 over 1.0.5 last night. My 1.0.5 setup was running
with no problems at all. Stupid me overwrote my dovecot.conf file with a
vanilla one. I know I know, backup!!! I am pretty sure my old
dovecot.conf file did not specify any namespaces, but I could be
Jeff Grossman wrote:
I installed 1.1Beta2 over 1.0.5 last night. My 1.0.5 setup was running
with no problems at all. Stupid me overwrote my dovecot.conf file with
a
vanilla one. I know I know, backup!!! I am pretty sure my old
dovecot.conf file did not specify any namespaces, but I could
Jeff Grossman wrote:
I looked through all of the 1.1 announcements and did not see it. I also
looked at the wiki page talking about the 1.0 to 1.1 upgrade, nothing
there.
I think the windows mobile device is looking for an INBOX. prefix where my
other setup (Thunderbird, Outlook, and
22 matches
Mail list logo
