On 22 Dec 2017, at 15.28, Tanstaafl wrote:
>
> On 12/22/2017, 1:19:45 AM, Aki Tuomi wrote:
>> Tanstaafl, maybe you could explain what you think the BURL/URLAUTH
>> stuff is for, or do you have some particular use case you would be using
>> it?
On 12/22/2017, 1:19:45 AM, Aki Tuomi wrote:
> Tanstaafl, maybe you could explain what you think the BURL/URLAUTH
> stuff is for, or do you have some particular use case you would be using
> it? Client support already is not required, and yes, it might take a
> long time
> On December 20, 2017 at 4:39 PM Tanstaafl wrote:
>
>
> On Sat Dec 16 2017 15:41:25 GMT-0500 (Eastern Standard Time), Tanstaafl
> wrote:
> > Ok, well, my ignorance is probably glaring here, but what I meant was,
> > the make the
On 2017-12-20 14:39, Tanstaafl wrote:
On Sat Dec 16 2017 15:41:25 GMT-0500 (Eastern Standard Time), Tanstaafl
wrote:
Ok, well, my ignorance is probably glaring here, but what I meant was,
the make the BURL/URLAUTH pieces strictly between Dovecot and the
backend SMTP
On Sat Dec 16 2017 15:41:25 GMT-0500 (Eastern Standard Time), Tanstaafl
wrote:
> Ok, well, my ignorance is probably glaring here, but what I meant was,
> the make the BURL/URLAUTH pieces strictly between Dovecot and the
> backend SMTP server, make it invisible to the
On 12/16/2017, 5:10:14 AM, Stephan Bosch wrote:
> Op 12/14/2017 om 6:07 PM schreef Tanstaafl:
>> One other point.
>>
>> Adding support for something like this that also requires Clients to add
>> support for it is just begging for a feature that never gets used.
>>
>>
Op 12/14/2017 om 6:07 PM schreef Tanstaafl:
> One other point.
>
> Adding support for something like this that also requires Clients to add
> support for it is just begging for a feature that never gets used.
>
> Stephan, are you sure there is no (fairly simple) way to make this an
> SMTP service
One other point.
Adding support for something like this that also requires Clients to add
support for it is just begging for a feature that never gets used.
Stephan, are you sure there is no (fairly simple) way to make this an
SMTP service that any email client that supports SMTP can use?
On
On 12/14/2017, 3:03:41 AM, Aki Tuomi wrote:
> On 13.12.2017 21:41, Tanstaafl wrote:
>> On 12/12/2017, 1:39:08 PM, Stephan Bosch wrote:
>> I thought this was simply going to be an SMTP like service that any SMTP
>> client could utilize, keeping the
Op 14-12-2017 om 8:26 schreef María Arrea:
Stephan, thank you very much for your hard work. I want to ask
your opinion about jmap ( http://jmap.io/ ) , do you think is a viable
alternative to current IMAP + MSA ?
Difficult to tell at this point, as It is not finished yet. It all
On 13.12.2017 21:41, Tanstaafl wrote:
> On 12/12/2017, 1:39:08 PM, Stephan Bosch wrote:
>> However, keep in mind that for this particular feature we're just
>> providing the "chicken" as it were. The "egg", i.e. client support, is
>> still to come. Apart from Trojita
Stephan, thank you very much for your hard work. I want to ask your
opinion about jmap ( http://jmap.io/ ) , do you think is a viable
alternative to current IMAP + MSA ?
Regards
María
El 12/12/17 a las 00:14, Stephan Bosch escribió:
Hi,
As some of you know, I started
On 12/12/2017, 1:39:08 PM, Stephan Bosch wrote:
> However, keep in mind that for this particular feature we're just
> providing the "chicken" as it were. The "egg", i.e. client support, is
> still to come. Apart from Trojita (which I think is still not widely
> used), I
Am 12.12.2017 um 00:14 schrieb Stephan Bosch:
> Hi,
>
> As some of you know, I started implementing the SMTP submission proxy a
> few years ago. It acts as a front-end for any MTA, adding the necessary
> functionality for an SMTP submission service, also known as a Mail
> Submission Agent (MSA)
Op 12-12-2017 om 15:28 schreef Tanstaafl:
This is fantastic Stephan! Especially since I'll soon be rolling a new
Dovecot server to act as a backup for our current Office 365 mail, as
well as to be prepared in case I can ever talk the boss into migrating
back to dovecot (we were using Dovecot
Hi,
As some of you know, I started implementing the SMTP submission proxy a
few years ago. It acts as a front-end for any MTA, adding the necessary
functionality for an SMTP submission service, also known as a Mail
Submission Agent (MSA) (https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6409). The main
reason I
16 matches
Mail list logo