Re: [Dovecot] 2.0.X -> 2.1 pitfalls?

2012-02-20 Thread Timo Sirainen
On 20.2.2012, at 19.30, Metro Domain Admin wrote: > On 2/18/12 8:37 AM, Thomas Leuxner wrote: >>> are there any pitfalls known for the migration from 2.0.18 to 2.1? >> http://wiki2.dovecot.org/Upgrading/2.1 > > Squat is apparently deprecated: > http://dovecot.org/list/dovecot/2011-December/0626

Re: [Dovecot] 2.0.X -> 2.1 pitfalls?

2012-02-20 Thread Metro Domain Admin
On 2/18/12 8:37 AM, Thomas Leuxner wrote: are there any pitfalls known for the migration from 2.0.18 to 2.1? http://wiki2.dovecot.org/Upgrading/2.1 Squat is apparently deprecated: http://dovecot.org/list/dovecot/2011-December/062630.html

Re: [Dovecot] 2.0.X -> 2.1 pitfalls?

2012-02-18 Thread Thomas Leuxner
>> are there any pitfalls known for the migration from 2.0.18 to 2.1? http://wiki2.dovecot.org/Upgrading/2.1 signature.asc Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail

Re: [Dovecot] 2.0.X -> 2.1 pitfalls?

2012-02-18 Thread Jim Knuth
am 17.02.12 19:48 schrieb Frank Elsner : Hi all, are there any pitfalls known for the migration from 2.0.18 to 2.1? Can I simply stop dovecot, make install and start again? THIS also interests me. --Frank Elsner -- Mit freundlichen Grüßen, with kind regards, Jim Knuth -