On 16/05/2011 13:46, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On Mon, 2011-05-16 at 14:08 +0200, Osvaldo Alvarez Pozo wrote:
>
>> But if I erase mail from Mozilla Thunderbird then I find no mail with
>> ref count=0 and doveadm purge does nothing.
>
> doveadm purge only purges mails that have been expunged. So I gu
Yeah, looks right. And once you've migrated everyone, change
mail_location globally and remove them from userdb.
On Fri, 2011-05-13 at 08:46 +0200, Osvaldo Alvarez Pozo wrote:
> Ok I want to do migration without downtime
>
> Yes i have red that the separator depends on mailbox format and that
> f
On Mon, 2011-05-16 at 14:08 +0200, Osvaldo Alvarez Pozo wrote:
> But if I erase mail from Mozilla Thunderbird then I find no mail with
> ref count=0 and doveadm purge does nothing.
doveadm purge only purges mails that have been expunged. So I guess your
TB has only marked mails \Deleted, but not
Hi
I have done some test.
If I use a webmail as roundcube to read mail mails, when I erase a
mail from Inbox and after that from trash.the command.
/usr/local/dovecot/bin/doveadm dump
/var/vmail1/example.org/user/mdbox/storage/|grep 'ref.*\b0\b'
show mail with ref count=0
- ext 3 ref :
On 05/16/2011 12:37 AM Osvaldo Alvarez Pozo wrote:
> Hi
> thanks but I do not have doveadm-purge. I have doveadm and I can run
> it with -purge option and that's wath I did with no result.
>
Please stop Top-posting.
OK, if man 1 doveadm-purge didn't work for you, run doveadm purge help.
You may
Hi
thanks but I do not have doveadm-purge. I have doveadm and I can run
it with -purge option and that's wath I did with no result.
Thanks
2011/5/16 Pascal Volk :
> On 05/16/2011 12:29 AM Osvaldo Alvarez Pozo wrote:
>> Hi
>> I am testing mdbox.
>> …
>> How can I erase deleted mails?
>>
>
> See do
On 05/16/2011 12:29 AM Osvaldo Alvarez Pozo wrote:
> Hi
> I am testing mdbox.
> …
> How can I erase deleted mails?
>
See doveadm-purge(1)
Regards,
Pascal
--
The trapper recommends today: fabaceae.1113...@localdomain.org
Hi
I am testing mdbox.
I noticed that after deleting mail from inbox and trash the mail are
always in the mdbox I mean it size has not changed.
I executed:
/usr/local/dovecot/bin/doveadm -Dv purge -u u...@example.org
but nothing changed the filess size have not changed
I did /usr/local/dovecot/
Am 13.05.2011 08:46, schrieb Osvaldo Alvarez Pozo:
> Ok I want to do migration without downtime
>
> Yes i have red that the separator depends on mailbox format and that
> for maildir it is '.'
>
> So in my dovecot.conf I have no namespace definition and my mail-location is:
>
> mail_location = m
Ok I want to do migration without downtime
Yes i have red that the separator depends on mailbox format and that
for maildir it is '.'
So in my dovecot.conf I have no namespace definition and my mail-location is:
mail_location = maildir:/var/vmail/%d/%u/Maildir
But when I execute the dsync comma
On 13.5.2011, at 1.00, Osvaldo Alvarez Pozo wrote:
> Actually I have no namespace definition. If i add namespace definition
> for start migrating, waht about my clients? will they be able to find
> there mail & mailboxes while I am migrating from maildir to mdbox?
Your clients see the default na
On 5/12/2011 6:00 PM, Osvaldo Alvarez Pozo wrote:
Hi all
I migrated from dovecot 1.2 to dovecot 2.0
Next step" migrate from maildir to mdbox"
I have being reading about migrating to mdbox as Timo pointed me out.
But I have douths with namespace. I tried to use dsync and I got a
error:
dsync(
Hi all
I migrated from dovecot 1.2 to dovecot 2.0
Next step" migrate from maildir to mdbox"
I have being reading about migrating to mdbox as Timo pointed me out.
But I have douths with namespace. I tried to use dsync and I got a
error:
dsync(root): Fatal: Mail locations must use the same virtu
On Mon, 2011-04-25 at 19:02 +0200, Osvaldo Alvarez Pozo wrote:
> hi all
>
> We have an ocfs2 cluster compose of 4 Debian lenny serveurs wich have
> access to an ISCSI LUN we have create a partition on this Lun and
> formated this partition as OCFS2.
> 2 serveurs does mail delivery (SMTP) and the t
Am 27.04.2011 00:50, schrieb Joseph Tam:
> Robert Schetterer writes:
>
>>> Anyway, why use lmtp over lda ?
>>
>> i.e avoid backscatter by overquota
>
> A clarification on this: backscatter (or rather, ambiguous NDR notices
> that claim many users are over quota rather than just one) is a result
Hi all
I decided to upgrade to 2.0 i compiled dovecot with ssl and mysql, but
i have problems with lmtp configuration.
this is the error.
pr 27 01:04:36 debian dovecot: auth: Fatal:
net_connect_unix(auth-worker) in directory
/usr/local/dovecot/var/run/dovecot failed: Permission denied
(euid=65534
Robert Schetterer writes:
Anyway, why use lmtp over lda ?
i.e avoid backscatter by overquota
A clarification on this: backscatter (or rather, ambiguous NDR notices
that claim many users are over quota rather than just one) is a result
of a local mailer that support multiple recipient delive
Am 25.04.2011 19:02, schrieb Osvaldo Alvarez Pozo:
> hi all
>
> We have an ocfs2 cluster compose of 4 Debian lenny serveurs wich have
> access to an ISCSI LUN we have create a partition on this Lun and
> formated this partition as OCFS2.
> 2 serveurs does mail delivery (SMTP) and the two other are
On Mon, 2010-07-12 at 16:12 -0300, Thiago Henrique wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I intend to make a cluster with Dovecot + OCFS2. The tests are working
> with the default settings of the Dovecot. But it seems too easy to be
> true.
Be sure to stress test with imaptest tool, with two of them running
simulta
On Tue, 2007-10-02 at 17:46 +0200, Jon Blazquez wrote:
> Hello,
> We are running Red Hat Enterprise Linux AS release 4 (Nahant Update 4)
> with OCFS2 for our mail servers. There are three nodes in the cluster
> with shared storage and OCFS2 filesystem on it. The filesystem
> is used for mail stor
Hi,
The load reaches 20, which is not that far from your MAX_DAEMON_CHILDREN
directive in sendmail.
You should try to find why the delivery processes are so slow to
accomplish. Maybe it's a I/O backend problem. (I have experienced the
same kind of problems with drbd writing, and slow hard disk
Thank you for your response,
With sendmail we have achieved to limit the load :
define(`confMAX_DAEMON_CHILDREN', `15')
define(`confCONNECTION_RATE_THROTTLE', `2')dnl
define(`confQUEUE_LA', `5')dnl
define(`confREFUSE_LA', `4')dnl
With this configuration the LOAD only reaches 20 ;-) but it’s not
Jon Blazquez wrote:
The system works fine but when there are mailing lists the load
increases dramatically.
Any suggestions?
First thing that I would do is to reduce number of concurrent deliver
processes. I have no clue how this is done with Sendmail but with
Postfix one could adjust deli
23 matches
Mail list logo
