On 2/28/2013 4:09 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 01.03.2013 01:02, schrieb Jerry:
On Thu, 28 Feb 2013 23:26:43 +
Ed W articulated:
I believe the high profile user of polarssl is the Dutch government
who have approved OpenVPN + PolarSSL for use. (The point being that
openssl is just too huge
Am 01.03.2013 01:02, schrieb Jerry:
> On Thu, 28 Feb 2013 23:26:43 +
> Ed W articulated:
>
>> I believe the high profile user of polarssl is the Dutch government
>> who have approved OpenVPN + PolarSSL for use. (The point being that
>> openssl is just too huge to audit for security)
>
> Jus
On Thu, 28 Feb 2013 23:26:43 +
Ed W articulated:
> I believe the high profile user of polarssl is the Dutch government
> who have approved OpenVPN + PolarSSL for use. (The point being that
> openssl is just too huge to audit for security)
Just because a program has a large footprint does not
On 28/02/2013 14:17, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On 27.2.2013, at 23.15, Charles Marcus wrote:
Just curious if you ever thought about supporting other than just OpenSSL?
PolarSSL looks really interesting, has no major dependencies and is very
lightweight compared to OpenSSL, GNUTLS or others...
ht
On 27.2.2013, at 23.15, Charles Marcus wrote:
> Just curious if you ever thought about supporting other than just OpenSSL?
>
> PolarSSL looks really interesting, has no major dependencies and is very
> lightweight compared to OpenSSL, GNUTLS or others...
>
> https://polarssl.org/
>
> I guess