On Mon, 23 Nov 2009 11:46:35 -0500
Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On Mon, 2009-11-23 at 09:59 +0200, Nikita Koshikov wrote:
> > With above patch applied, I got this one crash:
> >
> > Nov 23 09:42:59 IMAP(al...@domain.com): Panic: file mail-index-sync-ext.c:
> > line 625 (mail_index_sync_ext_hdr_update
On Mon, 2009-11-23 at 09:59 +0200, Nikita Koshikov wrote:
> With above patch applied, I got this one crash:
>
> Nov 23 09:42:59 IMAP(al...@domain.com): Panic: file mail-index-sync-ext.c:
> line 625 (mail_index_sync_ext_hdr_update): assertion failed: (ext->hdr_offset
> + offset + size <= map->hdr
On Fri, 20 Nov 2009 13:53:18 -0500
Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On Fri, 2009-11-20 at 10:23 +0200, Nikita Koshikov wrote:
> > Nov 20 10:16:00 IMAP(al...@domain.com): Panic: file
> > mail-transaction-log-append.c: line 31 (log_append_buffer): assertion
> > failed: ((type & MAIL_TRANSACTION_)
>
> Oh,
On Fri, 2009-11-20 at 10:23 +0200, Nikita Koshikov wrote:
> Nov 20 10:16:00 IMAP(al...@domain.com): Panic: file
> mail-transaction-log-append.c: line 31 (log_append_buffer): assertion failed:
> ((type & MAIL_TRANSACTION_)
Oh, missed that one: http://hg.dovecot.org/dovecot-1.2/rev/fa8a438c64ce
On Thu, 19 Nov 2009 18:53:19 -0500
Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On Thu, 2009-11-19 at 18:31 -0500, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> > On Thu, 2009-11-19 at 09:10 +0200, Nikita Koshikov wrote:
> > > Nov 19 08:57:34 IMAP(al...@domain.com): Warning: header rewrite:
> > > size=32824
> > > Nov 19 08:57:34 IMAP(al...
On Thu, 2009-11-19 at 18:31 -0500, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On Thu, 2009-11-19 at 09:10 +0200, Nikita Koshikov wrote:
> > Nov 19 08:57:34 IMAP(al...@domain.com): Warning: header rewrite: size=32824
> > Nov 19 08:57:34 IMAP(al...@domain.com): Warning:
> > mail_index_update_header_ext: ext_id=2 offset
On Thu, 2009-11-19 at 09:10 +0200, Nikita Koshikov wrote:
> Nov 19 08:57:34 IMAP(al...@domain.com): Warning: header rewrite: size=32824
> Nov 19 08:57:34 IMAP(al...@domain.com): Warning:
> mail_index_update_header_ext: ext_id=2 offset=0 size=32824
> Nov 19 08:57:34 IMAP(al...@domain.com): Warning:
On Wed, 18 Nov 2009 11:55:40 -0500
Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On Wed, 2009-11-18 at 10:04 +0200, Nikita Koshikov wrote:
>
> > #10 0x080d03d2 in buffer_write (_buf=0xb7e1a670, pos=67100436,
> > data=0xbb53ae0, data_size=32824) at buffer.c:63
> > No locals.
> > #11 0x080d04f6 in buffer_append (buf=0x
On Wed, 2009-11-18 at 10:04 +0200, Nikita Koshikov wrote:
> #10 0x080d03d2 in buffer_write (_buf=0xb7e1a670, pos=67100436,
> data=0xbb53ae0, data_size=32824) at buffer.c:63
> No locals.
> #11 0x080d04f6 in buffer_append (buf=0xb7e1a670, data=0xbb53ae0,
> data_size=32824) at buffer.c:168
> No loc
On Wed, 18 Nov 2009 06:18:06 -0500
Charles Marcus wrote:
> On 11/18/2009, Nikita Koshikov (koshi...@gmail.com) wrote:
> > Today, I have updated to version 1.2.7 and I was able to get
> > gdb-backtrace with it. This is clean installation without any patches
> > applied.
>
> Probably a good idea t
On 11/18/2009, Nikita Koshikov (koshi...@gmail.com) wrote:
> Today, I have updated to version 1.2.7 and I was able to get
> gdb-backtrace with it. This is clean installation without any patches
> applied.
Probably a good idea to always provide dovecot -n output too...
--
Best regards,
Charles
> I guess it's just exponentially increasing the buffer size then until it
> reaches mail_process_size.
>
> > I recompile dovecot binaries with debug symbols, but seemed that gdb
> > backtrace is broken.
>
> Yeah, it is. Hmm. Since the core isn't working, can you attach gdb to
> imap process whi
On Thu, 29 Oct 2009 12:38:22 -0400
Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On Thu, 2009-10-29 at 12:11 +0200, Nikita Koshikov wrote:
> > On Wed, 28 Oct 2009 14:17:52 -0400
> > Timo Sirainen wrote:
> >
> > > On Wed, 2009-10-28 at 10:39 +0200, Nikita Koshikov wrote:
> > > > > > Oct 26 15:26:38 IMAP(gozhd...@domai
On Thu, 29 Oct 2009 12:38:22 -0400
Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On Thu, 2009-10-29 at 12:11 +0200, Nikita Koshikov wrote:
> > On Wed, 28 Oct 2009 14:17:52 -0400
> > Timo Sirainen wrote:
> >
> > > On Wed, 2009-10-28 at 10:39 +0200, Nikita Koshikov wrote:
> > > > > > Oct 26 15:26:38 IMAP(gozhd...@domai
On Thu, 29 Oct 2009 12:38:22 -0400
Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On Thu, 2009-10-29 at 12:11 +0200, Nikita Koshikov wrote:
> > On Wed, 28 Oct 2009 14:17:52 -0400
> > Timo Sirainen wrote:
> >
> > > On Wed, 2009-10-28 at 10:39 +0200, Nikita Koshikov wrote:
> > > > > > Oct 26 15:26:38 IMAP(gozhd...@domai
On Thu, 2009-10-29 at 12:11 +0200, Nikita Koshikov wrote:
> On Wed, 28 Oct 2009 14:17:52 -0400
> Timo Sirainen wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 2009-10-28 at 10:39 +0200, Nikita Koshikov wrote:
> > > > > Oct 26 15:26:38 IMAP(gozhd...@domain.com): Panic: data stack: Out of
> > > > > memory when allocating 26
On Wed, 28 Oct 2009 14:17:52 -0400
Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On Wed, 2009-10-28 at 10:39 +0200, Nikita Koshikov wrote:
> > > > Oct 26 15:26:38 IMAP(gozhd...@domain.com): Panic: data stack: Out of
> > > > memory when allocating 268435472 bytes
> > > > Oct 26 15:26:38 IMAP(gozhd...@domain.com): Error
On Wed, 2009-10-28 at 10:39 +0200, Nikita Koshikov wrote:
> > > Oct 26 15:26:38 IMAP(gozhd...@domain.com): Panic: data stack: Out of
> > > memory when allocating 268435472 bytes
> > > Oct 26 15:26:38 IMAP(gozhd...@domain.com): Error: *** glibc detected ***
> > > imap: double free or corruption (!
On Tue, 27 Oct 2009 17:50:22 -0400
Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On Tue, 2009-10-27 at 09:48 +0200, Nikita Koshikov wrote:
> > I have one user, which have a lot of folders (not it is 414 without INBOX).
> > When he tries to create one more folder with random name - the folder
> > successfully created,
On Tue, 2009-10-27 at 09:48 +0200, Nikita Koshikov wrote:
> I have one user, which have a lot of folders (not it is 414 without INBOX).
> When he tries to create one more folder with random name - the folder
> successfully created, but LIST command invokes out of memory to imap process.
>
> From
20 matches
Mail list logo