On 14.08.2015 23:20, Andrzej A. Filip wrote:
> As I understand:
> * maildir is designed for allowing fast "lockless" parallel deliveries
> * dovecot's LDA updates some dovecot specific index/cache files even for
>deliveries to maildir
> => making postfix deliver to maildir without updating do
On Aug 17, 2015, at 9:30 AM, Gregory Finch wrote:
<..snip..>
> With that many messages, it may be the index updates that are slowing
> things down. Depending on your needs or how you use this folder (it
> sounds automated to me), you may not need the indexes on disk at all. If
> you set the ind
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 2015-08-14 7:52 AM, Chad M Stewart wrote:
>
> The problem happened again this morning. Removing fsync calls helped,
but I'm not sure about leaving that enabled long term.
>
> I still believe the problem is multiple dovecot processes trying to
w
Chad M Stewart wrote:
> On Aug 14, 2015, at 1:01 PM, Andrzej A. Filip wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> Are docecot and postfix located on the same server?
>> Can postfix access (deliver) directly maildir file directory dovecot uses?
>>
>
> For the moment yes they are on the same server. I designed it to be
On Aug 14, 2015, at 1:01 PM, Andrzej A. Filip wrote:
>
>
> Are docecot and postfix located on the same server?
> Can postfix access (deliver) directly maildir file directory dovecot uses?
>
For the moment yes they are on the same server. I designed it to be modular,
the various components
Chad M Stewart wrote:
> On Aug 12, 2015, at 11:04 AM, Andrzej A. Filip
> wrote:
>>
>>
>
> <..snip..>
>
>> Could you provide the following info:
>> a) mailbox type (maildir/mbox/dbox/...)
>
> maildir
>
>> [mail_location in dovecot's config]
>
> /srv/mail///
>
>> b) file system type (ext2/ext3/e
The problem happened again this morning. Removing fsync calls helped, but I'm
not sure about leaving that enabled long term.
I still believe the problem is multiple dovecot processes trying to write to a
single folder at the same time. (If I could run dtrace I might be able to
cobble togethe
On Aug 12, 2015, at 11:58 AM, Daniel Tröder wrote:
> On 08/12/2015 17:19, Chad M Stewart wrote:
>> What I'm seeing is very high load on the system (40) and queues building on
>> the Postfix side.
> High load means, that there are a lot of processes waiting to run. The
> most likely cause for th
On 08/12/2015 17:19, Chad M Stewart wrote:
> What I'm seeing is very high load on the system (40) and queues building on
> the Postfix side.
High load means, that there are a lot of processes waiting to run. The
most likely cause for this is not CPU consumption, but I/O wait.
Please run vmstat an
On Aug 12, 2015, at 11:25 AM, Chad M Stewart wrote:
>
<..snip..>
> Since I posted I've changed a couple of things: ulimit -n 8192, and disabled
> fsync as in mail_fsync = never. I'm not sure if I'll put it back in the LMTP
> section or not. Given all the hardware abstraction layers.
I f
On Aug 12, 2015, at 11:04 AM, Andrzej A. Filip wrote:
>
>
<..snip..>
> Could you provide the following info:
> a) mailbox type (maildir/mbox/dbox/...)
maildir
> [mail_location in dovecot's config]
/srv/mail///
> b) file system type (ext2/ext3/ext4/fat32/...)
> [provided by "df -T" command
Chad M Stewart wrote:
> Dovecot 2.2.18 on CentOS 6
>
> I have a pair of servers setup with MySQL, Postfix, and Dovecot. Replication
> is setup and working between the two dovecot instances.
>
> The problem I'm running into is that a single mailbox receives a lot
> of messages, at times the rate
Dovecot 2.2.18 on CentOS 6
I have a pair of servers setup with MySQL, Postfix, and Dovecot. Replication
is setup and working between the two dovecot instances.
The problem I'm running into is that a single mailbox receives a lot of
messages, at times the rate is multiple messages per second.
13 matches
Mail list logo
