On 15:55 Wed 28 Mar , Josef 'Jeff' Sipek wrote:
> Ok, there are two commits:
>
> 35497604d80090a02619024aeec069b32568e4b4 and
> 5522b8b3d3ed1a99c3b63bb120216af0bd427403
>
> Together, they should be identical to the patch I sent the other day plus
> your fixup. Let me know if you have any
On Tue, Mar 27, 2018 at 08:46:20 -0400, Josef 'Jeff' Sipek wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 27, 2018 at 13:15:31 +0300, Apollon Oikonomopoulos wrote:
> > On 13:05 Tue 27 Mar , Apollon Oikonomopoulos wrote:
> > > On 11:31 Tue 27 Mar , Apollon Oikonomopoulos wrote:
> > > It turns out there's a missing
On Tue, Mar 27, 2018 at 13:15:31 +0300, Apollon Oikonomopoulos wrote:
> On 13:05 Tue 27 Mar , Apollon Oikonomopoulos wrote:
> > On 11:31 Tue 27 Mar , Apollon Oikonomopoulos wrote:
> > It turns out there's a missing byte-inversion when loading the blocks
> > which should be addressed in
On 13:05 Tue 27 Mar , Apollon Oikonomopoulos wrote:
> On 11:31 Tue 27 Mar , Apollon Oikonomopoulos wrote:
> It turns out there's a missing byte-inversion when loading the blocks
> which should be addressed in getblock{32,64}. Murmurhash treats each
> block as an integer expecting
On 11:31 Tue 27 Mar , Apollon Oikonomopoulos wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 12:55 Mon 26 Mar , Josef 'Jeff' Sipek wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 26, 2018 at 15:57:01 +0300, Apollon Oikonomopoulos wrote:
> > ...
> > > I'd be happy to test the patch, thanks!
> >
> > Ok, try the attached patch. (It is a
Hi,
On 12:55 Mon 26 Mar , Josef 'Jeff' Sipek wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 26, 2018 at 15:57:01 +0300, Apollon Oikonomopoulos wrote:
> ...
> > I'd be happy to test the patch, thanks!
>
> Ok, try the attached patch. (It is a first pass at the issue, so it may not
> be the final diff that'll end up
On Mon, Mar 26, 2018 at 15:57:01 +0300, Apollon Oikonomopoulos wrote:
...
> I'd be happy to test the patch, thanks!
Ok, try the attached patch. (It is a first pass at the issue, so it may not
be the final diff that'll end up getting committed. It'd be good to know if
it actually fixes the issue
Hi Aki,
On 15:55 Mon 26 Mar , Aki Tuomi wrote:
> On 26.03.2018 15:49, Apollon Oikonomopoulos wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > The dovecot 2.3.0.1 Debian package currently fails to build on all
> > big-endian architectures[1], due to murmurhash3 tests failing. The
> > relevant output from e.g. s390x
On 26.03.2018 15:49, Apollon Oikonomopoulos wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The dovecot 2.3.0.1 Debian package currently fails to build on all
> big-endian architectures[1], due to murmurhash3 tests failing. The
> relevant output from e.g. s390x is:
>
> test-murmurhash3.c:22: Assert(#8) failed:
Hi,
The dovecot 2.3.0.1 Debian package currently fails to build on all
big-endian architectures[1], due to murmurhash3 tests failing. The
relevant output from e.g. s390x is:
test-murmurhash3.c:22: Assert(#8) failed: memcmp(result, vectors[i].result,
sizeof(result)) == 0
10 matches
Mail list logo