10.11.2016 16:47, Frank Elsner пишет:
On Wed, 9 Nov 2016 15:36:33 -0600 Brad Koehn wrote:
[ ... ]
To help detect and remove the infected messages after they’ve been delivered to
users’ mailboxes, I created a small script that iterates the INBOX and Junk
mailbox directories, scans recent m
Op 10-11-2016 om 12:25 schreef Brad Koehn:
On Nov 10, 2016, at 3:38 AM, Stephan Bosch wrote:
Op 11/10/2016 om 10:05 AM schreef Teemu Huovila:
On 09.11.2016 23:36, Brad Koehn wrote:
I’m wondering if there’s a better way to scan recent messages and eradicate
them so the Dovecot isn’t upset w
Turns out the technical part of your reasoning is correct: MUAs that have
downloaded the message don’t get any updates, and hold onto the infected
message. No legal ramifications here; it’s my personal server, and it’s in the
US. Strange to think that deleting the content of a message would some
On Wed, 9 Nov 2016 15:36:33 -0600 Brad Koehn wrote:
[ ... ]
> To help detect and remove the infected messages after they’ve been delivered
> to users’ mailboxes, I created a small script that iterates the INBOX and
> Junk mailbox directories, scans recent messages for viruses, and deletes the
I’ve decided to try this approach. I’ve updated my script as follows:
#!/bin/bash
# Scan junk folders for messages containing viruses we didn't have definitions
# for when the mail was received. Truncate the body of infected messages and
# replace the body with a message.
cd /var/mail
for dir
> On Nov 10, 2016, at 3:38 AM, Stephan Bosch wrote:
>
> Op 11/10/2016 om 10:05 AM schreef Teemu Huovila:
>>
>> On 09.11.2016 23:36, Brad Koehn wrote:
>>> I have discovered that many times the virus definitions I use for scanning
>>> messages (ClamAV, with the unofficial signatures
>>> http://
Op 11/10/2016 om 10:05 AM schreef Teemu Huovila:
>
> On 09.11.2016 23:36, Brad Koehn wrote:
>> I have discovered that many times the virus definitions I use for scanning
>> messages (ClamAV, with the unofficial signatures
>> http://sanesecurity.com/usage/linux-scripts/) are updated some time afte
On 09.11.2016 23:36, Brad Koehn wrote:
> I have discovered that many times the virus definitions I use for scanning
> messages (ClamAV, with the unofficial signatures
> http://sanesecurity.com/usage/linux-scripts/) are updated some time after my
> server has received an infected email. It seem
On 2016-11-09 21:36, Brad Koehn wrote:
I have discovered that many times the virus definitions I use for
scanning messages (ClamAV, with the unofficial signatures
http://sanesecurity.com/usage/linux-scripts/) are updated some time
after my server has received an infected email. It seems the virus
I have discovered that many times the virus definitions I use for scanning
messages (ClamAV, with the unofficial signatures
http://sanesecurity.com/usage/linux-scripts/) are updated some time after my
server has received an infected email. It seems the virus creators are trying
to race the viru
10 matches
Mail list logo
