Re: v2.2.27 Panic: file rfc822-parser.h: line 23 (rfc822_parser_deinit): assertion failed: (ctx->data <= ctx->end)

Hi Hendrik, Hendrik Boom via dovecot wrote on 29/3/19 4:03 am: > On Wed, Mar 27, 2019 at 10:25:02AM +1100, Jason Lewis via dovecot wrote: >> Hi Aki, >> >> debian jessie backports has been moved to archive.debian.org and >> initially I was unable to install dovecot-dbg because of that. But I've >>

Re: v2.2.27 Panic: file rfc822-parser.h: line 23 (rfc822_parser_deinit): assertion failed: (ctx->data <= ctx->end)

On Wed, Mar 27, 2019 at 10:25:02AM +1100, Jason Lewis via dovecot wrote: > Hi Aki, > > debian jessie backports has been moved to archive.debian.org and > initially I was unable to install dovecot-dbg because of that. But I've > managed to resolve that issue now. Just curious -- what deb line did

Re: v2.2.27 Panic: file rfc822-parser.h: line 23 (rfc822_parser_deinit): assertion failed: (ctx->data <= ctx->end)

> On 28 Mar 2019, at 1.08, Jason Lewis via dovecot wrote: > > Thanks Timo. > > Given the age of these dovecot packages, and this being on debian > oldstable, what should we do next? I'm inclined to just delete the email > in question and move on. > https://repo.dovecot.org/

Re: v2.2.27 Panic: file rfc822-parser.h: line 23 (rfc822_parser_deinit): assertion failed: (ctx->data <= ctx->end)

What's non-trivial about apt-get install dovecot-dbg? Aki On 26.3.2019 5.38, Jason Lewis via dovecot wrote: > After some investigation, it turns out it is non trivial to install > dovecot-dbg on debian jessie. > > Sorry I can't investigate further. > > Jason > > Aki Tuomi wrote on 25/3/19 6:12 pm

Re: v2.2.27 Panic: file rfc822-parser.h: line 23 (rfc822_parser_deinit): assertion failed: (ctx->data <= ctx->end)

After some investigation, it turns out it is non trivial to install dovecot-dbg on debian jessie. Sorry I can't investigate further. Jason Aki Tuomi wrote on 25/3/19 6:12 pm: > Can you install dovecot-dbg and try gdb again? > > Aki > > On 25.3.2019 3.20, Jason Lewis via dovecot wrote: >> Hi, >

Re: v2.2.27 Panic: file rfc822-parser.h: line 23 (rfc822_parser_deinit): assertion failed: (ctx->data <= ctx->end)

On 27 Mar 2019, at 1.25, Jason Lewis via dovecot wrote: > > Hi Aki, > > debian jessie backports has been moved to archive.debian.org and > initially I was unable to install dovecot-dbg because of that. But I've > managed to resolve that issue now. > > This was the command I ran: > doveadm -D -f

Re: v2.2.27 Panic: file rfc822-parser.h: line 23 (rfc822_parser_deinit): assertion failed: (ctx->data <= ctx->end)

Hi Aki, debian jessie backports has been moved to archive.debian.org and initially I was unable to install dovecot-dbg because of that. But I've managed to resolve that issue now. This was the command I ran: doveadm -D -f flow fetch imap.envelope mailbox crm-spam.2008.g Backtrace follows. Jason

Re: v2.2.27 Panic: file rfc822-parser.h: line 23 (rfc822_parser_deinit): assertion failed: (ctx->data <= ctx->end)

Thanks Timo. Given the age of these dovecot packages, and this being on debian oldstable, what should we do next? I'm inclined to just delete the email in question and move on. Jason Timo Sirainen wrote on 28/3/19 12:16 am: > On 27 Mar 2019, at 1.25, Jason Lewis via dovecot wrote: >> >> Hi Aki,

Re: v2.2.27 Panic: file rfc822-parser.h: line 23 (rfc822_parser_deinit): assertion failed: (ctx->data <= ctx->end)

Can you install dovecot-dbg and try gdb again? Aki On 25.3.2019 3.20, Jason Lewis via dovecot wrote: > Hi, > > I've been having an issue with the indexer giving me errors on mailbox > in dovecot. > > I managed to narrow it down to a specific email in that mailbox. > > Various dovecot functions ha

v2.2.27 Panic: file rfc822-parser.h: line 23 (rfc822_parser_deinit): assertion failed: (ctx->data <= ctx->end)

Hi, I've been having an issue with the indexer giving me errors on mailbox in dovecot. I managed to narrow it down to a specific email in that mailbox. Various dovecot functions have issues with this email. The email itself is just spam. I can email it to you if you want to analyse it. I did ru