> On 05/02/2024 7:48 AM MDT Marc via dovecot wrote:
>
> > auth_failure_delay = 2 secs ?
> >
> > That will still simply wait before *rejecting* the login, compared to
> > *dropping the connection*.
> >
> > We are thus looking for three different behaviours:
> >
> > 1. If backend confrims
>
> auth_failure_delay = 2 secs ?
>
> That will still simply wait before *rejecting* the login, compared to
> *dropping the connection*.
>
> We are thus looking for three different behaviours:
>
> 1. If backend confrims auth, ACK auth + proceed (grant access) to email.
>
> 2. If
Hi Marc,
On 2024/05/02 15:31, Marc wrote:
Looking for some advise.
Hmmm, I am glad I took the time to arrange a proper ldap infrastructure. What
ever gets hammered stays local
Hahaha, yea well, galera served us well until now, and assuming no DDL
changes on large tables we believe it will
> Looking for some advise.
Hmmm, I am glad I took the time to arrange a proper ldap infrastructure. What
ever gets hammered stays local
>
> What I'm hoping is that dovecot has some way to in case of such
> "authentication backend" problem scenarios to ignore protocol and
> politeness and
