Re: Figures in APT require extension

2009-01-21 Thread Trevor Harmon
On Jan 21, 2009, at 11:34 AM, Lukas Theussl wrote: Imagine for some obscure reason you would want to use doxia to transform a document from xdoc to latex to xhtml and back to xdoc. The final result should be identical to the original, which would not be possible if doxia changed some input

Re: Figures in APT require extension

2009-01-21 Thread Lukas Theussl
This is not really a change as it was always de facto like that (at least for apt). The reason is basically given in the discussion of DOXIA-99. Figures are just links, and so should be valid and unique in a source document. Imagine for some obscure reason you would want to use doxia to transf

Re: Figures in APT require extension

2009-01-21 Thread Trevor Harmon
Okay, so Doxia now requires figure references to specify an extension. Is there a particular reason why this change was necessary? I really like the old way because it allowed me to have two versions of the same figure, one PNG and one PDF, that would be selected automatically depending on

Re: Figures in APT require extension

2009-01-13 Thread Lukas Theussl
It's already documented in SVN [1], we just can't publish the site until 1.1 is released. -Lukas [1] https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/maven/doxia/site/src/site/apt/references/doxia-apt.apt Trevor Harmon wrote: I'm running into bug DOXIA-99: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/DOXIA-99 If

Figures in APT require extension

2009-01-12 Thread Trevor Harmon
I'm running into bug DOXIA-99: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/DOXIA-99 If I don't specify an extension, then the HTML is generated without one, causing the image to fail to load. If I do specify an extension, then the HTML has the extension, and the image loads properly. However, this p