[DQSD-Users] ANN: DictionaryPop 0.3

2004-01-11 Thread Tom Corcoran
Great Kim! I had stopped using the old version because of the problems, thanks for that. Tom. > From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Kim_Gr=E4sman?= <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: Sat, 10 Jan 2004 17:06:08 +0100 > Organization: Labs2 > Subject: [DQSD-Users] ANN: DictionaryPop 0.3 > Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --

RE: [DQSD-Users] Patent Searches, by number or keywords

2004-01-11 Thread Kim Gräsman
Sounds like a good idea - any takers? Looks like two of them (patno and pat) point to the same source, while the third (patapp) does not - does this complicate things? Kim > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of MLL > Sent: den 11 januari

RE: [DQSD-Users] ANN: DictionaryPop 0.3

2004-01-11 Thread MLL
Thank you Kim. MLL > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of > Kim Gräsman > Sent: Saturday, January 10, 2004 5:06 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [DQSD-Users] ANN: DictionaryPop 0.3 > > > Hi al

RE: [DQSD-Users] Patent Searches, by number or keywords

2004-01-11 Thread MLL
Yes, should be AFAICT. MLL > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of John W. > Bairen, Jr. > Sent: Saturday, January 10, 2004 4:59 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: [DQSD-Users] Patent Searches, by number or keywords > > > Question: >