Re: [DQSD-Users] Addons

2008-07-22 Thread Glenn Carr
You're right. I wrote the googlespell add-on a long time ago, and it was simply a 'search' that required more than a single .xml. Needless to say, I don't use googlespell anymore. :/ > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:dqsd-users- > [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kim G

Re: [DQSD-Users] Addons

2008-07-22 Thread tom . corcoran
Quoting Steve Babineau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > When I made it I didn't know any better *shrug*, but I think the > terminology is a little confusing. iptools isn't a "search", really, > it's an "add-on" to a product that allows you to search websites. > Pedantic, I know, but that's what confused me

Re: [DQSD-Users] Addons

2008-07-22 Thread Steve Babineau
I think that's probably pretty close to being accurate. In fact, I bet I could rewrite iptools as a "search" to keep in line with DQSD convention. iptools doesn't use anything special, really. When I made it I didn't know any better *shrug*, but I think the terminology is a little confusing. ip

Re: [DQSD-Users] Addons

2008-07-22 Thread Kim Gräsman
Hi guys, I wonder if addons are simply searches that require additional files, beyond the .xml spec? It seems so, looking at the existing ones. Other than that, I don't see how being an addon would allow greater reach than a search, except perhaps by convention. I think that's it, anyway: an addo