Hi Monty,
> heehee.. I think you missed the sarcasm of phil-dqsds'
> post...
You're absoutely right. It had been a very long night and I had gone days without
reading my email - only to find enough spam in my inbox (even after my filter took out
nearly a thousand messages) to make that sugges
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Monty
> Scroggins
> Sent: Monday, October 20, 2003 3:01 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [DQSD-Users] Selection of whois destination (betterwhois
> vs. whois.sc)
>
&g
heehee.. I think you missed the sarcasm of phil-dqsds' post... The
person recommending the change to the whois search has a motive in spawning
interest in the whois.sc site. Phil was just having some fun with it...
Monty
...We could then send out bulk e-mails...
Are you serious?
Bulk em
> > Not sure if you follow the whois area but www.whois.sc
> > is the best whois then betterwhois.com
> > You should remap the whois command to www.whois.sc
>
> I agree.
Though I like www.whois.sc - I don't like that it limits the number of
searches you can perform at any given time. It is hardly
I agree. If we really want to beef up the traffic on this relatively low
traffic mailing list, we should encourage e-mail from anyone who wants to
change DSQD search to direct more searches to their own sites. We could
then send out bulk e-mails asking for others to send in requests to this
